2001
DOI: 10.1046/j.1532-5415.2001.49199.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Survival in Finnish Centenarians in Relation to Apolipoprotein E Polymorphism

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
15
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
4
15
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The explanation for our novel finding, i.e., that the ε2-allele could benefit EL in the Italian and Japanese population, and specifically favor healthy attainment of EL in the Italian cohort, is less apparent and warrants further research. The ApoE ε2-allele has previously been reported to be more frequent in centenarians (Blanche et al, 2001;Louhija et al, 1994;Schachter et al, 1994;Seripa et al, 2006) than in younger people, but others found no differences (Asada et al, 1996;Capurso et al, 2004;Feng et al, 2011;Louhija et al, 2001;Panza et al, 1999). A meta-analysis considering only studies of centenarians published before 2004 gave a point estimate of 1.50 (95%CI, 1.27-1.78) for ε2-allele frequency in centenarians vs. younger controls (Lewis and Brunner, 2004).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The explanation for our novel finding, i.e., that the ε2-allele could benefit EL in the Italian and Japanese population, and specifically favor healthy attainment of EL in the Italian cohort, is less apparent and warrants further research. The ApoE ε2-allele has previously been reported to be more frequent in centenarians (Blanche et al, 2001;Louhija et al, 1994;Schachter et al, 1994;Seripa et al, 2006) than in younger people, but others found no differences (Asada et al, 1996;Capurso et al, 2004;Feng et al, 2011;Louhija et al, 2001;Panza et al, 1999). A meta-analysis considering only studies of centenarians published before 2004 gave a point estimate of 1.50 (95%CI, 1.27-1.78) for ε2-allele frequency in centenarians vs. younger controls (Lewis and Brunner, 2004).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, others found no association of this variant with EL in Japanese (Asada et al, 1996), Finnish (Louhija et al, 2001) or Southern-Italian centenarians (Capurso et al, 2004). Concurrently, the ApoE ε2-allele has been reported to be more frequent in centenarians (Blanche et al, 2001;Louhija et al, 1994;Schachter et al, 1994;Seripa et al, 2006) than in younger people, but others found no differences (Asada et al, 1996;Feng et al, 2011;Louhija et al, 2001;Panza et al, 1999). A meta-analysis reported a point estimate of 1.50 [95% confidence intervals (CI): 1.27, 1.78] and 0.49 (95%CI: 0.41, 0.58) for the frequency of ε2 and ε4-alleles, respectively, in centenarians vs. younger controls, but only studies published before 2004 were included in the review (Lewis and Brunner, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This allele has also been associated with coronary heart disease (12, 13) and cerebrovascular disease (14,15) in some studies but not in others (16,17). In addition, ApoE has been studied in the context of mortality, but the results of these studies are controversial (18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, different studies have reported mixed results in concerning the issue of longevity, with some documenting null findings for APOE e4 and longevity [59,60], and others showing negative associations in subgroups only [61].…”
Section: Apolipoprotein E (Apoe)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our study we expect that the number of survival in both gender will be similar, but as we observed that the deviations (differences between observed and expected), were different. When we compare the survival rate among both gender at age group (60)(61)(62)(63)(64)(65)(66)(67)(68)(69)(70)(71)(72)(73)(74) in 1995 vs. (73)(74)(75)(76)(77)(78)(79)(80)(81)(82)(83)(84)(85)(86)(87) in 2008, we observed more survival among males comparing to females (p=0.003), this means that the rate of mortality was higher among females, and the rate of survival was higher among males (p=0.003). Indeed, in 2008 we expected to have 86 males alive but we were surprised to find 108 males alive, in contrary we expected to have more females alive (157), but we only found 135 alive at 2008.…”
Section: Follow Upmentioning
confidence: 99%