2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2018.05.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Survival gain with re-Op/RT for recurred high-grade gliomas depends upon risk groups

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
10
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
2
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A significant benefit for patients who received an RT after second surgery was found (median OS after second surgery 8.5 vs. 13.4 months) [36]. This finding is in line with other reports [37][38][39]. Importantly, the indication for a second RT is re-thought currently.…”
Section: Recurrent Gliomasupporting
confidence: 83%
“…A significant benefit for patients who received an RT after second surgery was found (median OS after second surgery 8.5 vs. 13.4 months) [36]. This finding is in line with other reports [37][38][39]. Importantly, the indication for a second RT is re-thought currently.…”
Section: Recurrent Gliomasupporting
confidence: 83%
“…In re-irradiation series radiation necrosis is observed with high frequency, but this complication is not so common when re-irradiation is performed with SRT. In a study which investigated the role of salvage SRT in 84 patients, the authors did not observe any radiation necrosis [43]. In our study, salvage treatment with SRT was well tolerated, and no grade III/IV treatment-related toxicity was noted throughout the follow-up period.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 40%
“…The median OS of recurrent GBL after re-RT is affected by MGMT methylation (10.7 vs. 8.5 months, p = 0.06) [33]. It is noteworthy that a recent study on prognostic factors after re-RT firstly puts an emphasis on the importance of MGMT methylation status [57]. Three risk factors (age >50 years, WHO grade IV, and unmethylated promoter of MGMT) were significantly associated with poor OS in multivariate analysis.…”
Section: Re-rt Alonementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among 56 patients with recurrent GBL with time to recurrence >6 months, re-Op/RT with 45 Gy/25 fx (EQD2 of 42.8 Gy) was delivered to PTV having 8 mm margin from GTV in 33 patients with cumulative median EQD2 of 99.3 Gy (range, 85.5 to 106.9 Gy). The median PFS was significantly better (8.9 vs. 3.3 months; p = 0.031) compared to re-Op alone while the OS was only slightly better (20.6 vs. 15 months; p = 0.2) [57]. There was no grade ≥3 toxicity.…”
Section: Re-operation Prior To Re-irradiation (Re-op/rt)mentioning
confidence: 99%