2020
DOI: 10.1159/000505706
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stereotactic Radiotherapy in Recurrent Glioblastoma: A Valid Salvage Treatment Option

Abstract: Background: Glioblastoma (GBM) is a dismal disease. Recurrence is inevitable despite initial surgery and postoperative temozolomide (TMZ) and radiotherapy. Salvage surgery is the standard treatment in selected patients. Chemotherapy, biological agents, and re-irradiation are other treatment approaches available. Stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) is nowadays a common treatment as a salvage treatment option. Materials and Methods:We reviewed the files of 132 GBM cases treated between 2010 and 2018. All patients re… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Park et al [ 47 ] investigated preoperative risk factors for recurrent GBM patients, showing that tumor location near critical structures, poor KPS score, and high tumor volume (≥50 mL) correlated with poor survival after redone surgery. In the study of Yaprak et al, seven re-operated patients before salvage SRT had a significantly poorer OS after SRT compared to un-operated ones ( p = 0.02) [ 34 ]. De Bonis et al reported an increased survival when redone surgery was administered to recurrent GBM; however, the authors reported that patients with a KPS < 70 were significantly at risk of death (HR 2.8— p = 0.001) [ 48 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Park et al [ 47 ] investigated preoperative risk factors for recurrent GBM patients, showing that tumor location near critical structures, poor KPS score, and high tumor volume (≥50 mL) correlated with poor survival after redone surgery. In the study of Yaprak et al, seven re-operated patients before salvage SRT had a significantly poorer OS after SRT compared to un-operated ones ( p = 0.02) [ 34 ]. De Bonis et al reported an increased survival when redone surgery was administered to recurrent GBM; however, the authors reported that patients with a KPS < 70 were significantly at risk of death (HR 2.8— p = 0.001) [ 48 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies showed a survival benefit of SRT compared to observation, reporting an increased OS between 2 to 8 months [ 18 , 30 ]. Kondziolka et al [ 31 ] reported a median OS of 30 months from the time of initial diagnosis in 64 recurrent GBM patients re-irradiated with SRT, while other analyses [ 32 , 33 , 34 ] found a median OS of 8–12.5 months after salvage SRT for recurrent GBM.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results of our multivariate analysis showed that both beam radiotherapy and chemotherapy can immensely reduce the risk of patients with glioblastoma and improve the survival rate. Yaprak et al ( 29 ) and Liao et al ( 30 ) proved the feasibility of radiotherapy for glioblastoma. In our study, the prognosis of patients with beam radiation therapy was better than with non-beam radiation therapy (including radioactive implants, brachytherapy, radioisotopes, etc.)…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a consequence, more attention is given to minimally invasive salvage techniques, such as stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT), which represents a viable treatment option, especially in patients with long time-to-recurrence. Recently, Yaprak et al [ 21 ] showed the benefits of SRT in a cohort of 42 patients diagnosed with rGBM following a first-line treatment consisting of resective surgery plus adjuvant TMZ and radiation therapy, who underwent salvage stereotactic treatment. With a median of three fractions at a prescription dose of 20 Gy (range, 18–30), the group was able to demonstrate a statistically significant difference in the survival time between the SRT-treated population (mean, 30 months; range, 9–123) and the patients who could not receive SRT (mean, 14 months; range, 1–111) ( p = 0.001).…”
Section: Locoregional Treatment Of Rgbmmentioning
confidence: 99%