2020
DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.01051
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Nomogram Model Predicting Overall Survival and Guiding Clinical Decision in Patients With Glioblastoma Based on the SEER Database

Abstract: Background: Patients with glioblastoma have a poor prognosis. We want to develop and validate nomograms for predicting overall survival in patients with glioblastoma. Methods: Data of patients with glioblastoma diagnosed pathologically in the SEER database from 2007 to 2016 were collected by SEER * Stat software. After eliminating invalid and missing clinical information, 3,635 patients (total group) were finally identified and randomly divided into the training group (2,183 cases) and the verification group (… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This however also suggests that there remain unknown explanatory factors associated with survival. Despite advances in histological and molecular subtypes, the factors included in prognostic models are mainly clinical observations such as PS, age and corticosteroid treatment (4,(9)(10)(11)(12). Tissue biomarkers and data from imaging techniques have been suggested as independent prognostic factors (6,25,26), and may contribute to improvement of future prognostic models.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This however also suggests that there remain unknown explanatory factors associated with survival. Despite advances in histological and molecular subtypes, the factors included in prognostic models are mainly clinical observations such as PS, age and corticosteroid treatment (4,(9)(10)(11)(12). Tissue biomarkers and data from imaging techniques have been suggested as independent prognostic factors (6,25,26), and may contribute to improvement of future prognostic models.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two molecular factors, the promoter methylation of the O 6 -methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) gene and the mutation of the isocitrate dehydrogenase-1 (IDH-1), an indicator of progression from lower grade glioma (secondary glioblastoma), have been identified as prognostic factors associated with a favorable prognosis (6)(7)(8). The most consistent and well-described clinical prognostic factors associated with a poor survival include: increasing age, poor performance status (PS), low degree of surgical resection of tumor, and the use of corticosteroids (4,(9)(10)(11).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, the accuracy of the nomogram was evaluated by applying a calibration curve. In the calibration curve, if the predicted value is equal to the actual observed value, the curve will fall on the ideal 45 • slant (11). All statistical analyses of this study were performed using the IBM SPSS 20.0 software (IBM, USA) and Graphpad Prism8 software (GraphPad Software Inc., La Jolla, CA, USA).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A higher Cindex means a better predictive value. (Wang and Li et al, 2013;Zhu and Zhu et al, 2016) The nomogram utility has been assessed in many elds, like bladder cancer, (Yang and Bai et al, 2020) esthesioneuroblastomas, (Jiang and Lin et al, 2020) non-metastatic breast cancer, (Qian and Jia et al, 2020) or in neurosurgery of cancers like glioblastoma (Li and He et al, 2020) and so forth. Of note, this is the rst research to introduce nomogram into pediatric primary BSMG before the onset of therapies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%