Survival following primary surgery for oral cancer

Rogers, Simon N.; Brown, James S.; Woolgar, Julia A.; Lowe, Derek; Magennis, Patrick; Shaw, Richard; Sutton, David; Errington, Douglas; Vaughan, David J.

doi:10.1016/j.oraloncology.2008.05.008

Cited by 377 publications

(300 citation statements)

References 31 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

272

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…It is difficult to compare our outcomes directly with others because of variations in patient characteristics, treatment modality and report of outcome data. The 2-year and 3-year survival rates in this study were 38% and 26%, very much lower compared with other studies using surgery (Chandu et al, 2005;Rogers et al, 2009). This finding may be due to higher percentage of the patients with advanced stages in this study compared to the other studies.…”

Section: A) B) C) D) E) F)contrasting

confidence: 79%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Survival Following Non Surgical Treatments for Oral Cancer: a Single Institutional Result

Larizadeh

Shabani²

2012

Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: A) B) C) D) E) F)contrasting

confidence: 79%

“…A variable range of overall survival has been reported for oral cancer (Yeole, 2003;Warnakulasuriya, 2007;Brandizzi, 2008;Effiom et al, 2008;Montoro et al, 2008;Rogers et al, 2009). In Australia an overall survival rate of 83.3% has been reported (Chandu, 2005).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Survival Following Non Surgical Treatments for Oral Cancer: a Single Institutional Result

Larizadeh

Shabani²

2012

Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…A discovery cohort of 55 cases from June 2003 to November 2008 (pN staging: 17 pN0; 11pN þ ECS À ; 27pN þ ECS þ ) and a validation cohort of 47 cases from December 2008 to June 2010 (pN staging: 21 pN0; 11pN þ ECS À ; 15pN þ ECS þ ) were identified. All cases had both snap-frozen and formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tumour/normal tissue available and were distinct from previously published cohorts from the same regional unit (Field et al, 1995;Shaw et al, 2006;Rogers et al, 2009;Shaw et al, 2010;Lwin et al, 2012;Shaw et al, 2013).…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

SERPINE1 and SMA expression at the invasive front predict extracapsular spread and survival in oral squamous cell carcinoma

Dhanda

Triantafyllou

Lilogou

et al. 2015

British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…A recent study in the NW England showed a five year overall survival of 74% for tumours <2 cm compared with 44% for those over 4 cm (p <0.0001). 11 In 2003/4 the West of Scotland Cancer Awareness Programme (WoSCAP) was launched to raise public awareness. WoSCAP is a social marketing campaign designed to improve the early detection and treatment of mouth and bowel cancer in the West of Scotland by raising the profile of these cancers and to encourage those 'at risk' to present earlier to the NHS if they experience any signs and symptoms of either disease.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

The experiences of young oral cancer patients in Scotland: symptom recognition and delays in seeking professional help

et al. 2010

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objectives: To explore the early responses of young oral cancer patients in Scotland to the symptoms of their emerging condition, to understand the ways they seek help and to inquire into delay caused by not recognising symptoms associated with cancer. Setting: The survey was carried out in Maggie's Centres or in patients' own homes in Glasgow and Edinburgh among young patients diagnosed with oral cancer in the three years (2004-7) before the study. Methods: This study employed qualitative methods. Data were collected by interview using a semi-structured interview schedule. The interview transcripts were analysed using a thematic framework and with the aid of NVivo qualitative analysis software (Version 8). Results: Most of the cohort knew that smoking and alcohol could cause oral cancer. None thought it would happen to them. Descriptions of symptoms varied widely and several had used self-treatment provided from a pharmacy. There were various causes of 'patient delay' and self-treatment was not the only cause. Reinterpretation of symptoms without seeking professional help was not uncommon. Nobody suspected they had oral cancer until it was confirmed by their GP or GDP. All thought that something so small and painless couldn't be a serious problem. Conclusions: The study further confirms gaps in understanding and awareness of oral cancer. Most had heard of oral cancer but they didn't think their symptoms were indicative of cancer and they self managed the problem. The culture of not bothering the GP/GDP unless it was perceived as serious is a barrier to earlier access. Findings support that further public awareness of oral cancer and its symptoms is required to alert the public that if their symptoms persist beyond three weeks they need a professional opinion

show abstract

Survival following primary surgery for oral cancer

Cited by 377 publications

References 31 publications

Survival Following Non Surgical Treatments for Oral Cancer: a Single Institutional Result

Survival Following Non Surgical Treatments for Oral Cancer: a Single Institutional Result

SERPINE1 and SMA expression at the invasive front predict extracapsular spread and survival in oral squamous cell carcinoma

The experiences of young oral cancer patients in Scotland: symptom recognition and delays in seeking professional help

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About