2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2016.03.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Survival and growth of native Tachigali vulgaris and exotic Eucalyptus urophylla×Eucalyptus grandis trees in degraded soils with biochar amendment in southern Amazonia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
16
0
3

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
3
16
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results showed that survivorship was highest in the biochar addition at the BC1 rate (1.1 t/ha), though these results are not significantly different from the control treatment ( Figure 1). A similar observation was made by Farias et al [40]. More strikingly, survival varied by a factor of two among the different treatments, with BC5 (5 t/ha), BC5 + F, and fertilizer alone, significantly reducing seedling survival as compared to the control and BC1 treatments.…”
Section: Survivorshipsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Our results showed that survivorship was highest in the biochar addition at the BC1 rate (1.1 t/ha), though these results are not significantly different from the control treatment ( Figure 1). A similar observation was made by Farias et al [40]. More strikingly, survival varied by a factor of two among the different treatments, with BC5 (5 t/ha), BC5 + F, and fertilizer alone, significantly reducing seedling survival as compared to the control and BC1 treatments.…”
Section: Survivorshipsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Previous field‐based studies in tropical or subtropical forests found soils amended with biochar increased (Lin et al, ; Sovu, Savadago, & Oden, ) or had no effect (de Farias et al, ; Lin et al, ) on tree growth. Mixed wood ash applied to a Pinus radiata planation caused an increase in tree growth three years after application in a Mediterranean climate (Omil, Pineiro, & Merino, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Another possible reason for a lack of a biochar effect on tree growth observed in this study could be due to the particular tree species investigated. Angiosperm seedlings respond better to biochar than gymnosperm seedlings (Pluchon, Gundale, Nilsson, Kardol, & Wardle, 2014) possibly due to angiosperm seedlings responding more to soil fertility than gymnosperm seedlings (Bond, 1989;Coomes et al, 2005) or poor adaptation to increased pH by gymnosperms (Sarauer & Coleman, 2018a). Thomas and Gale (2015) also suggest that the reduced response from conifers could be due to lower nutrient uptake rates and adaptation to surviving in acid soils causing conifers to be resource-conservative compared to angiosperms.…”
Section: Tree Diameter Growthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Varying doses of macadamia BC combined with two fertilizer rates had contrasting results on soil nutrients and ambiguous trends in the growth of young E. nitens [34]. BC did not enhance survival or growth of a Eucalyptus hybrid on degraded soils in southern Amazonia [35]. Compost and BC-compost mixes did not improve the performance of poplar, willow, and alder SRWCs [36].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%