2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2005.09.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surveying mountain pine beetle damage of forests: A review of remote sensing opportunities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
243
0
3

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 321 publications
(247 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
(39 reference statements)
1
243
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…At present, aerial detection survey maps are the best available information to determine prefire outbreak stage. Finer-resolution data from aerial or satellite imagery (47) or detailed prefire field measurements may aid in assigning beetle outbreak stage to individual trees or patches of trees rather than the whole fire. Third, fire severity and postfire tree regeneration outcomes may differ in forests with more uniformly high outbreak severity (e.g., consistently >50% tree mortality) (24) or in later stages of postoutbreak forests (e.g., >10 y after infestation) when most or all beetle-killed trees have fallen to the ground (14,15,17,30).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At present, aerial detection survey maps are the best available information to determine prefire outbreak stage. Finer-resolution data from aerial or satellite imagery (47) or detailed prefire field measurements may aid in assigning beetle outbreak stage to individual trees or patches of trees rather than the whole fire. Third, fire severity and postfire tree regeneration outcomes may differ in forests with more uniformly high outbreak severity (e.g., consistently >50% tree mortality) (24) or in later stages of postoutbreak forests (e.g., >10 y after infestation) when most or all beetle-killed trees have fallen to the ground (14,15,17,30).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hansen & DeFries, 2004). Maps of forest disturbances such as fire (Tansey et al, 2004;Roy et al, 2005) and insect defoliation (Wulder et al, 2006) represent special cases of forest change categorical variables. Percentage or proportion of forest cover (HĂ€me et al, 2001;Hansen et al, 2003;McRoberts, 2006McRoberts, , 2009bMcRoberts, , 2010a and biomass (Dong et al, 2003;Blackard et al, 2008) are examples of continuous variables.…”
Section: Types Of Maps and Productsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are at least three major strategies for using remote sensing to assess forest damage: early damage detection, extent mapping, and damage quantification [6]. In forest health, most studies have used remote sensing techniques to map forest conditions at a regional or stand level [9][10][11][12][13][14][15]. Individual tree damage is often investigated for disturbance across stand level extents [16][17][18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%