Survey of Recent Routing Metrics and Protocols for Mobile Ad-Hoc Networks

Quy, Vu Khanh; Education, Viet Nam; Ban, Nguyễn Tiến; Nam, Vi Hoai; Tuan, Dao Minh; Hân, Nguyễn Đình

doi:10.12720/jcm.14.2.110-120

Cited by 49 publications

(28 citation statements)

References 59 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…To evaluate the performance of GAR, we perform comparative simulation to validate the three types of routing, GAR, AODV, and DSR, and focus on the following three important performance metrics for comparative evaluation (Quy et al, 2019 ).…”

Section: Simulation and Discussmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Genetic-Algorithm-Based Optimization Routing for FANETs

2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In view of the characteristics of high mobility of FANETs nodes, combined with the features of Topology-based class routing protocol on-demand search, a Genetic-algorithm-based routing (GAR) protocol is proposed for FANETs which based on improved genetic algorithm for FANETs route search, and it taking into account the link stability, link bandwidth, node energy, and other factors. GAR improves the selection, crossover, and variation operators of the genetic algorithm so that GAR can finally plan an optimized route from the communication initiating node to the destination node quickly using a smaller cost. The experimental results show that GAR can largely improve the throughput, reduce the delay and improve the stability of the network, which is more suitable for FANETs.

show abstract

Section: Simulation and Discussmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Genetic-Algorithm-Based Optimization Routing for FANETs

2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Like ExOR, ORW also uses ACK overhearing within the set of forwarders to avoid duplicate forwarding. Unlike ExOR protocols, where nodes worked with ETX [ 4 , 52 , 53 ], in ORW nodes use a routing metric called EDC (Expected Duty Cycle) [ 11 , 54 ]. First, the sender calculates its own EDC and probes its neighbors by adding its EDC value along with the packet header.…”

Section: Evolution Of Opportunistic Routing In Asynchronous Wsnmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Survey on the Evolution of Opportunistic Routing with Asynchronous Duty-Cycled MAC in Wireless Sensor Networks

Akter

Kang

2020

Sensors

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Wireless sensor networks (WSNs) have been used for environmental monitoring and reporting for many decades. Energy consumption is a significant research topic because wireless sensor nodes are battery-operated to be highly energy-constrained. Several strategies have been introduced in routing and MAC (Medium Access Control) layer protocols to facilitate energy saving. At the routing layer, an energy-efficient routing protocol, known as opportunistic routing (OR), has been designed to improve efficiency. OR achieves energy efficiency via load-balancing, which forwards packets along multiple routes over WSNs. At the MAC layer, an energy-efficient MAC protocol known as the asynchronous duty-cycled MAC (ADCM) protocol achieves energy saving by turning on and off a sensor node’s transmitter and receiver to eliminate unnecessary energy wastage. These protocols each have their own advantages and disadvantages. OR achieves energy efficiency at the routing layer but it raises an issue at the MAC layer. ADCM achieves energy efficiency at the MAC layer, but it hinders the packet forwarding efficiency of the OR. To attain better energy efficiency, a combination of these two ideas led to the development of OR with asynchronous duty-cycled MAC (OR-ADCM). However, even with better energy efficiency, limitations still exist in combining load-balancing and duty-cycling due to conflicts in the inherent properties of OR and ADCM. In this paper, we present a survey of the evolution of OR-ADCM over WSNs to help the reader better understand and appreciate the details of this tradeoff, which we hope will lead to the development of better protocol designs.

show abstract

“…AODV or OLSR should be considered when the load of the network is increased. Also many of related works [16][17][18][19] do not take into account the energy consumption influence on the protocols, this paper use both QoS and the energy consimuption as the valued metrics in the simulation of MANET routing protocols. We can conclude the aim of our simulation into two main points:…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Performance evaluation of MANET routing protocols based on QoS and energy parameters

Mohamed¹,

Abdel-Fatah²,

Mohamed³

2020

IJECE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Routing selection and supporting Quality of Service (QoS) are fundamental problems in Mobile Ad Hoc Network (MANET). Many different protocols have been proposed in the literature and some performance simulations are made to address this challenging task. This paper discusses the performance evaluation and comparison of two typical routing protocols; Ad Hoc On-Demand Distance Vector (AODV) and Destination-Sequenced Distance-Vector (DSDV) based on measuring the power consumption in network with varing of the QoS parameters. In this paper, we have studied and analyzed the impact of variations in QoS parameter combined with the choice of routing protocol, on network performance. The network performance is measured in terms of average throughput, packet delivery ratio (PDR), average jitter and energy consumption. The simulations are carried out in NS-3. The simulation results show that DSDV and AODV routing protocols are less energy efficient. The main aim of this paper is to highlight the directions for the future design of routing protocol which would be better than the existing ones in terms of energy utilization and delivery ratio.

show abstract

Survey of Recent Routing Metrics and Protocols for Mobile Ad-Hoc Networks

Cited by 49 publications

References 59 publications

A Genetic-Algorithm-Based Optimization Routing for FANETs

A Genetic-Algorithm-Based Optimization Routing for FANETs

A Survey on the Evolution of Opportunistic Routing with Asynchronous Duty-Cycled MAC in Wireless Sensor Networks

Performance evaluation of MANET routing protocols based on QoS and energy parameters

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About