1982
DOI: 10.1080/00074918212331334090
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Survey of Recent Developments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

1986
1986
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Konsekuensinya, kompetisi masyarakat dalam memanfaatkan air semakin tinggi, sehingga sangat potensial menimbulkan konflik antar stakeholders (Adnyana, 2003, Hidayati dkk, 2012 Pemerintah atas nama pembangunan sering mengabaikan pengetahuan dan kearifan lokal dalam pengelolaan sumber daya air yang telah dilakukannya secara turun temurun. Hal ini diindikasikan oleh upayaupaya pemerintah, seperti dalam meningkatkan produksi padi melalui teknologi dan subsidi harga untuk pupuk dan pestisida/herbisida (Dick, 1982;Fox, 1991;Mears, 1984), dan mengontrol harga beras serta pembangunan infrastruktur, terutama sistem irigasi (Collier et al, 1982;Dick, 1982;Fox, 1991). Akibatnya, pengelolaan air mengalami perubahan dari oleh masyarakat menjadi oleh pemerintah dengan pendekatan top-down.…”
Section: Kegiatan Pembangunan Dan Modernisasiunclassified
“…Konsekuensinya, kompetisi masyarakat dalam memanfaatkan air semakin tinggi, sehingga sangat potensial menimbulkan konflik antar stakeholders (Adnyana, 2003, Hidayati dkk, 2012 Pemerintah atas nama pembangunan sering mengabaikan pengetahuan dan kearifan lokal dalam pengelolaan sumber daya air yang telah dilakukannya secara turun temurun. Hal ini diindikasikan oleh upayaupaya pemerintah, seperti dalam meningkatkan produksi padi melalui teknologi dan subsidi harga untuk pupuk dan pestisida/herbisida (Dick, 1982;Fox, 1991;Mears, 1984), dan mengontrol harga beras serta pembangunan infrastruktur, terutama sistem irigasi (Collier et al, 1982;Dick, 1982;Fox, 1991). Akibatnya, pengelolaan air mengalami perubahan dari oleh masyarakat menjadi oleh pemerintah dengan pendekatan top-down.…”
Section: Kegiatan Pembangunan Dan Modernisasiunclassified
“…By the time of his burial in early 1982, the state appeared to be losing control of society, which was in the grip of a crime wave depicted through newspaper images of bandits robbing people without police in sight and regular stories of violent crime inflicted upon innocent civilians.49 Underpinning the law-and-order crisis was a demographic crisis. By the early-1980s, the population of Surabaya's inner-city kampongs was only about two thirds larger than what it had been in the late 1960s, stressing toilets and wells and increasing the risk of water-born diseases for a people whose health was already compromised by poor nutrition after a severe drought in hinterland food-growing regions followed a reduction in subsidies on basic foodstuffs.50 People were hungry and struggling to find work as population growth far outpaced job growth in a stagnating economy that was trying to diversify away from a dependence on oil exports (Dick 1982;McCawley 1983;Arndt 1983). Those suffering most were Surabaya's recent migrants, the majority of them young men from the countryside who mingled at bus stations, markets, and along streets, looking for work unloading trucks, selling bus tickets, busking, begging, and joining 'Massa 33' , the notorious citywide gang that claimed 50,000 members.51…”
Section: The Repatriated Corpsementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In conclusion, the general outside view of the Indonesian policy is very negative. From its inception, it led to considerable apprehension among trading partners (Dick 1982). It has been associated with worsening terms of trade and increasing bilateralism (Lutkenhorst 1984).…”
Section: Seton (1980) Provides An Overview Of Indonesian Bilateral Trmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The theory was that, in a global buyer's market, risks could be shifted to western exporters. Modelling on Soviet-bloc experiencethe policy was announced in haste soon after the minister of trade returned from Eastern Europe (Dick 1982) -Indonesia did not allow for the difference between manufacturing and primary production, with the latter subject to more internationalcontrols andquotas. It also failed to allow for the possibility of retaliation by trading partners.…”
Section: Seton (1980) Provides An Overview Of Indonesian Bilateral Trmentioning
confidence: 99%