Survey of recent advances on the interface between production system design and quality

Inman, Robert R.; Blumenfeld, Dennis E.; Huang, Ning; Li, Jingshan; Li, Jing

doi:10.1080/0740817x.2012.757680

Cited by 61 publications

(30 citation statements)

References 117 publications

(108 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Potwierdza to szereg opracowań dostępnych w literaturze (np. prace [15,21,22,29,38,40,51]). Jednocześnie, w poszukiwaniu lepszej efektywności i wydajności, systemy produkcyjne są poddawane procesom reingineeringu, dostosowując je do nowoczesnych koncepcji zarządzania (takich jak np.…”

Section: Wstępunclassified

Assessment methods of production processes reliability – state of the art

Chlebus

Werbińska-Wojciechowska

2017

Journal of KONBiN

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Wstępunclassified

Assessment methods of production processes reliability – state of the art

Chlebus

Werbińska-Wojciechowska

2017

Journal of KONBiN

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…On the other hand, as the investments associated with production line come from the same source, the costs associated with storage within the line are going to burden the budget associated with the improvement of the quality and vice versa. (Inman, Blumenfeld, Huang, & Li, 2013) present a survey of recent advances on the interface between quality and production systems design, they provide evidence that production design impact quality and quality impact production design. Also the location of the inspection station affects both the expected production cost per item and the production rate of the line.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Hybrid Method for Solving Buffer Sizing and Inspection Stations Allocation

Ouzineb

Mhada

Pellerin

et al. 2014

Progress in Pattern Recognition, Image Analysis, Computer Vision, and Applications

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Part 1: Knowledge-Based Performance ImprovementInternational audienceThe buffer sizing problem in unreliable production lines is an important, indeed, complex combinatorial optimization problem with many industrial applications. These applications include quality, logistics and manufacturing production systems. In the formulation of the problem, the system consists of n machines, n fixed-size buffers and m inspection station in series. The objective is to minimize a combined storage and shortage costs, and also specifying the optimal location of inspection stations in the system. The present paper aims at optimizing a generalization of the model previously proposed in (Mhada et al., 2014) using a novel approach. In this approach, we combine Tabu Search (TS) and Genetic Algorithm (GA) to identify search regions with promising locations of inspection stations and an exact method to optimize the assignment of buffer sizes for each location. This approach provides a balance between diversification and intensification. Numerical results on test problems from previous research are reported. Using this approach, we can reduce the solution time by more than 97% in some cases

show abstract

“…The scale required for commercial production volumes-where layout design is important-was not being reached at that point. Identifying dispositional links to the product architecture [12], quality parameters [24], and incorporation of quality control points [22] is supported by the PSA modelling framework.…”

Section: Structural Elements Of a Psamentioning

confidence: 99%

“…• Indication of obtainable quality, as quality is generally prioritized over flexibility and should be considered during production system development [22].…”

Section: Functional Elements Of a Psa (What Can It Do?)mentioning

confidence: 99%

Modelling production system architectures in the early phases of product development

Guðlaugsson

Ravn

Mortensen

et al. 2016

Concurrent Engineering

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article suggests a framework for modeling a Production System Architecture (PSA) in the early phases of product development. The challenge in these phases is that the products to be produced are not completely defined and yet decisions need to be made early in the process on what investments are needed and appropriate to enable determination of obtainable product quality.In order to meet this challenge, it is suggested that a visual modeling framework be adopted that clarifies which product and production features are known at a specific time of the project and which features will be worked on-leading to an improved basis for prioritizing activities in the project.Requirements for the contents of the framework are presented and literature on production and system models is reviewed. The PSA modeling framework is founded on methods and approaches in literature and adjusted to fit the modeling requirements of a PSA at an early phase of development. The PSA models capture and describe the structure, capabilities and expansions of the PSA under development.The PSA modeling framework is tested in a case study and the results indicate that the modeling process facilitates identification of critical factors of the PSA, that the PSA models capture and describe the structure, capabilities, and expansions of a PSA under development, and that the PSA models can facilitate dialogue on the PSA between heterogeneous stakeholder groups. Draft page 2Keywords: Production modeling, system modeling, production architecture, production system architecture, production modeling, product architecture, concurrent engineering. IntroductionWhen developing a Production System Architecture (PSA), methods exist for describing the product architecture [1][2][3]; however, when developing a product architecture in parallel with developing new products during technology development, the definition of the products and the production system that existing approaches in literature rely on, are not complete.To support the development of the production system despite the incomplete definition of both the products and the production system, two approaches may be valuable: (i) Graphically modelling the incompletely defined PSA [4]. (ii) Developing the PSA concurrently with the development of the product architecture that will define the products to be produced by the PSA [5][6][7][8]. To accomplish this, however, we need a modelling approach which clearly shows which parts of the product and production system architecture have been defined and stabilized, and which parts are still under development.Concurrent development of product architecture and a PSA during technology development is illustrated in Figure 1. The production task definition [9] in the early phases includes external factors leading to crucial functional requirements to the production system. In technology developmentcovering Technology Readiness Levels 1-5 [10]-the product design, product performance, required and obtainable product quality, production processes, and produ...

show abstract

Survey of recent advances on the interface between production system design and quality

Cited by 61 publications

References 117 publications

Assessment methods of production processes reliability – state of the art

Assessment methods of production processes reliability – state of the art

A Hybrid Method for Solving Buffer Sizing and Inspection Stations Allocation

Modelling production system architectures in the early phases of product development

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About