1995
DOI: 10.1080/02331939508844053
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Survey of penalty, exact-penalty and multiplier methods from 1968 to 1993

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 181 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…See, for example, [1][2][3][4][5][6] and the references mentioned there. A penalty function is said to have the exact penalty property if there is a a constant Λ > 0 such that for any penalty coefficient larger than Λ, solutions of the unconstrained penalized problem are solutions of the corresponding constrained problem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…See, for example, [1][2][3][4][5][6] and the references mentioned there. A penalty function is said to have the exact penalty property if there is a a constant Λ > 0 such that for any penalty coefficient larger than Λ, solutions of the unconstrained penalized problem are solutions of the corresponding constrained problem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A penalty function is said to have the exact penalty property [1,3,5,9] if there is a penalty coefficient for which a solution of an unconstrained penalized problem is a solution of the corresponding constrained problem. We study two constrained nonconvex minimization problems with Lipschitzian (on bounded sets) cost functions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For more discussions and various applications of exact penalization to various constrained optimization problems see [1,3,5,9,14].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A penalty function is said to have the exact penalty property [1,3,5,9] if there is a penalty coefficient for which a solution of an unconstrained penalized problem is a solution of the corresponding constrained problem. In this paper we establish sufficient conditions for the exact penalty property.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%