Survey of oral health-related quality of life among skeletal malocclusion patients following orthodontic treatment and orthognathic surgery

Schmidt, Angela Maria da Rocha; Ciesielski, Robert; Orthuber, Wolfgang; Koos, Bernd

doi:10.1007/s00056-013-0151-2

Cited by 25 publications

(10 citation statements)

References 13 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…In the future it is interesting to see how treatment affects patients' wellbeing. For example, in the studies by Al-Ahmad et al [38] and Lee et al [39], patients' OQoL improved posttreatment, while the results by Schmidt et al [40] suggest that some patients are still not satisfied with their aesthetic and functional outcomes, suffer from psychological difficulties, and withdraw from social life. Therefore, it is important not to focus solely on group differences between patients and controls, but to also include within-group comparisons to find those patients who do not benefit from treatment as much as they expected.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 92%

Psychosocial well-being of prospective orthognathic-surgical patients

Alanko

Svedström-Oristo

Peltomäki

et al. 2014

Acta Odontologica Scandinavica

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 92%

Psychosocial well-being of prospective orthognathic-surgical patients

Alanko

Svedström-Oristo

Peltomäki

et al. 2014

Acta Odontologica Scandinavica

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…1 The motivating factors for undergoing orthodontic treatment are enhanced dental and facial esthetics and, consequently, minimized psychosocial problems, which contribute to QoL. 2,3 Many studies [4][5][6][7] have explored the physical, social, or psychological effects of orthodontic treatment and how discomfort and pain affect these aspects of QoL. [4][5][6][7] It was found that depending on the phase of the treatment, orthodontic treatment may either compromise or improve oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Temporary deterioration of oral health–related quality of life (OHRQoL) in nonextraction and extraction modalities of comprehensive orthodontic treatment in adolescents

Jena¹,

Mohapatra²,

Sharan³

et al. 2020

The Angle Orthodontist

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: To evaluate the effects of nonextraction and all first premolar extraction modalities of orthodontic treatment on oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) among adolescents. Materials and Methods: Sixty-eight adolescents of aged 12-18 years were chosen. Subjects who required nonextraction orthodontic treatment were included in group I, and those who required all first premolar extractions for orthodontic treatment were included in group II. Baseline OHRQoL data (T 0 ) were recorded before the start of treatment. To evaluate the impact of orthodontic treatment on OHRQoL, the Oral Health Impact Profile-14 (OHIP-14) questionnaire was presented to all subjects for retrospective evaluation at 1 month (T 1 ), 3 months (T 2 ), 6 months (T 3 ) and 1 year (T 4 ) after the start of orthodontic treatment and 1 week after completion of orthodontic treatment (T 5 ). Results: At T 1 and T 2 , the physical pain and physical disability domains of OHIP-14 were impacted significantly by comprehensive orthodontic treatment in both groups (P , .001). The negative impact of orthodontic treatment on OHRQoL was maximum at T 1 and then slowly recovered to the pretreatment level at T 3 in both groups. Recovery of OHIP-14 scores was relatively faster in group I subjects compared to group II subjects. At T 1 and T 2 , social disability and handicap domains were deteriorated significantly in group II subjects compared to group I subjects (P , .01). Conclusions: The severity of OHRQoL deterioration was similar in both modalities of orthodontic treatment, but recovery from negative impacts was relatively slower in the first premolar extraction subjects. (Angle Orthod. 2020;90:578-586.)

show abstract

“…Awareness of how facial appearance affects quality of life has rapidly increased the demand for such treatment. In most cases, the motivating factors for undergoing orthodontic treatment are enhanced dental and facial aesthetics and consequently minimized psychosocial problems 2,3. Studies of oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) in orthodontics are important because they provide information about therapeutic needs and outcomes as well as long-term oral health improvement 4.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Randomized controlled clinical trial of oral health-related quality of life in patients wearing conventional and self-ligating brackets

2014

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ObjectiveThe aim of this randomized controlled clinical trial was to compare oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) of patients treated with conventional, active self-ligating (ASL), and passive self-ligating (PSL) brackets in different therapeutic phases.MethodsSixty patients (mean age 18.3 years; 29 males and 31 females) requiring orthodontic treatment were randomly and equally assigned to receive conventional (Victory Series), ASL (In-Ovation R), or PSL (Damon 3MX) brackets. OHRQoL was measured with a self-administered modified 16-item Malaysian version of the Oral Health Impact Profile for immediate (soon after the visit) and late (just before the subsequent visit) assessments of the bonding and activation phases. Data were analyzed with the Kruskal-Wallis and chi-square tests.ResultsThe PSL and ASL groups showed more immediate and late impacts in the bonding phase, respectively; the conventional group was affected in both the assessments. The first activation phase had similar impacts in the groups. After the second activation, the conventional group showed more immediate impacts, whereas the PSL and ASL groups had more late impacts. The commonly affected domains were "physical disability," "functional limitation," "physical pain," and "psychological discomfort." No significant differences in the prevalence and severity of immediate and late impacts on OHRQoL of the patients were noted in any therapeutic phase.ConclusionsNo bracket system seems to ensure superior OHRQoL. This information could be useful for explaining the therapeutic phases, especially the initial one, and selecting the optimal bracket system based on the patient's preference.

show abstract

Survey of oral health-related quality of life among skeletal malocclusion patients following orthodontic treatment and orthognathic surgery

Cited by 25 publications

References 13 publications

Psychosocial well-being of prospective orthognathic-surgical patients

Psychosocial well-being of prospective orthognathic-surgical patients

Temporary deterioration of oral health–related quality of life (OHRQoL) in nonextraction and extraction modalities of comprehensive orthodontic treatment in adolescents

Randomized controlled clinical trial of oral health-related quality of life in patients wearing conventional and self-ligating brackets

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About