2017 Systems of Signal Synchronization, Generating and Processing in Telecommunications (SINKHROINFO) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/sinkhroinfo.2017.7997514
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Survey of modulation and coding schemes for application in CubeSat systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, around 64% of the systems reviewed in this paper employed QPSK either alone or with other modulation schemes. Most CubeSat transceivers tend to use the aforementioned modulation schemes, especially GMSK and BPSK, due to the complexity of higher order modulation transceivers and the strict CubeSat limitations on energy consumption [87]. BPSK is the one of the most widely used modulation schemes for CubeSats because it is simple to implement and demands the least amount of power to support a given throughput [87].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Nevertheless, around 64% of the systems reviewed in this paper employed QPSK either alone or with other modulation schemes. Most CubeSat transceivers tend to use the aforementioned modulation schemes, especially GMSK and BPSK, due to the complexity of higher order modulation transceivers and the strict CubeSat limitations on energy consumption [87]. BPSK is the one of the most widely used modulation schemes for CubeSats because it is simple to implement and demands the least amount of power to support a given throughput [87].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most CubeSat transceivers tend to use the aforementioned modulation schemes, especially GMSK and BPSK, due to the complexity of higher order modulation transceivers and the strict CubeSat limitations on energy consumption [87]. BPSK is the one of the most widely used modulation schemes for CubeSats because it is simple to implement and demands the least amount of power to support a given throughput [87]. GMSK is uniquely attractive for its efficient spectral characteristics, although it has worse BER performance compared to BPSK [87].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is attributed to the fact that GMSK signals have better spectral characteristics than OQPSK. Also, they have a constant envelope, allowing amplifiers to operate in the saturation region, which increases the power efficiency; however, GMSK has a poor error performance when compared to OQPSK [76]. In order to improve the BER, the authors in [76] proposed to employ a Viterbi decoder, leading to a higher computational complexity at the receiver.…”
Section: Modulation and Codingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the shift towards SDR payload and ground stations, made possible by the rapid evolution of digital electronics, opens the opportunity to implement more advanced communication protocols and modulation schemes, including error correction capabilities and dynamic adaptation of modulation parameters depending on the current link conditions [55]. This has motivated some theoretical studies on the choice of the most appropriate modulations [56,57]. However, there are already some innovative transceiver designed for CubeSat and Small Satellites using higher-frequency bands such as X-band up to Ka-band, implementing Variable and Adaptive Coding and Modulation (VCM, ACM) capabilities [58,59].…”
Section: Advances In Communications and Network Protocolsmentioning
confidence: 99%