Survey and overview of Mobile Ad-Hoc Network routing protocols

Srivastava, Ashish; Mishra, Atul; Upadhyay, Bikash; Yadav, Akhilesh Kumar

doi:10.1109/icaetr.2014.7012959

Cited by 17 publications

(7 citation statements)

References 2 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…MANET routing protocols can be classified in various ways. Classification of routing protocols as table driven and source initiated depending upon the strategy of routing while based on structure of network the routing protocols are classified as flat routing (both table driven and source initiated), hierarchical routing and geographic assisted position routing [11], [2], [20].…”

Section: Figure2 Manet Protocol Stackmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

A Review of Mobile Ad-Hoc Networks Reactive or on-Demand Routing Protocols

Yuvanithya¹,

Jagadeeswaran²

2017

ijarcs

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A MANET (Mobile Ad-hoc network) is a self-configuring infrastructure less network of portable routes associated by wireless connections. All mobile nodes play the role of a router moreover as a host. The topology of MANET is not stable. It is similar to the TCP/IP stack with little modification for end to end transmission. Routing is the challenging task in MANET because nodes moves freely and works as a host and router at the same time in different environment. Many researchers have proposed many routing protocols which work well in different conditions. This paper provides a survey of different reactive routing protocol in MANET.

show abstract

Section: Figure2 Manet Protocol Stackmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Route Error, iv. HELLO messages Route discovery is done with RREQ and RREP whereas route maintenance is carried with RERR and HELLO messages [11], [12]. The source node broadcasts a RREQ when it needs to transmit a data to a destination which is unknown.…”

Section: A Ad Hoc On-demand Distance Vector Protocolmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Review of Mobile Ad-Hoc Networks Reactive or on-Demand Routing Protocols

Yuvanithya¹,

Jagadeeswaran²

2017

ijarcs

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…[1,2] Nowadays, the use of wireless devices in most applications has increased significantly in the last few years, due to which the amount of data transmitted from these devices is too large and there is a possibility of further development. Researchers have proposed various techniques and route protocol [3] to adjust the requirements of these increasing data volumes and Improve the efficiency of these wireless networks. Most of the routing protocols inside the network are utilized to determine the path.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

ZBLE: “Energy Efficient Zone-Based Leader Election Multipath Routing Protocol for MANETs”

Sahu¹,

Sharma²,

Rizvi³

2019

IJITEE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Inside the paper, an analysis of the representation of a zone-based multipath routing technology called Zone-Based Leader Election Energy Constrained AOMDV Routing Protocol (ZBLE) for MANETs has been presented. The primary purpose of the MANETs is to make system communication effective and efficient so that the quality of the network can be ensured. Consumption of energy in the MANETs has extended been a larger problem since the past. Movable devices present into the wireless environment are dependent on batteries and cannot fulfill the power supply due to limited power capacity. To address this problem, we have used zone-based technology which is designed by modifying the AOMDV protocol. Inside here, the demonstration about a zone-based system for the wireless network has been analyzed which is called Zone-Based Leader Election Energy Constrained AOMDV Routing Protocol (ZBLE). It has been implemented for energy efficient communication based on energy label, node tracking, and power analysis. It is a zone-based technology that works in keeping with the energy of multipath routing in mind. ZBLE protocols prolong the network's life by reducing balanced energy consumption between nodes. This protocol is compared to the traditional route protocol i.e. AODV and AOMDV, in which it has been found that the ZBLE protocol presents better results

show abstract

“…The choice of a mobility model (MM) can favorite some designs over others. It must be efficiently readapted to every change occurring in the network topology (Srivastava et al, 2014). The performance of mobile ad hoc networks can vary significantly under different mobility models.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Experimental Synthesis of Routing Protocols and Synthetic Mobility Modeling for MANET

Ibadah

Minaoui

Rziza

et al. 2017

Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Sensor Networks

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Many performance analyses are already done with a lot of flaws. But, they do not look to all influenced constraints. In this study, we aim to summarize several parameters into 90 different scenarios with an average of 1350 simulated files. That shows results of three performance metrics combined with five mobile ad hoc routing protocols under three synthetic mobility models. All these parameters are applied to two dissimilar simulation areas. Basing on one exhaustive analysis with all these details like this paper; leads to well understand the accurate behaviors of routing protocols and mobility models used. By displaying the ability of every routing protocol to deal with some topology changes, as well as to ensure network performances.

show abstract

Survey and overview of Mobile Ad-Hoc Network routing protocols

Cited by 17 publications

References 2 publications

A Review of Mobile Ad-Hoc Networks Reactive or on-Demand Routing Protocols

A Review of Mobile Ad-Hoc Networks Reactive or on-Demand Routing Protocols

ZBLE: “Energy Efficient Zone-Based Leader Election Multipath Routing Protocol for MANETs”

Experimental Synthesis of Routing Protocols and Synthetic Mobility Modeling for MANET

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About