2003
DOI: 10.35371/kjoem.2003.15.1.95
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surveillance of Work-related Diseases in Kumi

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…According to the CTS surveillance system, CTS in 228 (72.6%) of 314 patients evaluated between 2000 and 2003 was suspected to have an occupation-related cause [12]. In Gumi-si, among 144 cases of occupational musculoskeletal disease between 2001 and 2002, 42 (33%) were CTS [13]. Furthermore, an occupation-related musculoskeletal disease monitoring system was operated from 2000 to 2004 generally by receiving reports from hospitals and workplace nurses, and the cases were analyzed according to gender, age, region, and occupation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the CTS surveillance system, CTS in 228 (72.6%) of 314 patients evaluated between 2000 and 2003 was suspected to have an occupation-related cause [12]. In Gumi-si, among 144 cases of occupational musculoskeletal disease between 2001 and 2002, 42 (33%) were CTS [13]. Furthermore, an occupation-related musculoskeletal disease monitoring system was operated from 2000 to 2004 generally by receiving reports from hospitals and workplace nurses, and the cases were analyzed according to gender, age, region, and occupation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…And 28 of the 34 cases were detected through the surveillance system that included liver function tests every 10 days for 3 months. In 30 cases (88.2%), toxic hepatitis occurred within 3 months of workers starting work at the company ( Table 2 ) ( 12 ). Table 3 shows the cases of toxic hepatitis caused by DMF or DMAc in Korea ( Table 3 ).…”
Section: Occupational Hepatic Disorders In Koreamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…직업성 천식은 천식 증상이 없을 때는 객관적인 소견이 없는 특 징들 때문에 건강한 근로자를 대상으로 하는 특수건강진단으로는 발견이 쉽지 않은 질병으로 [11,12], 상대적으로 병•의원 또는 대학 병원 호흡기내과에서 발견되는 경우가 많은 것으로 추정되고 있지 만 [13], 직업성 천식의 규모가 어느 정도인지도 잘 파악이 안 되고 있는 실정이다 [14]. 현재 국내에서 운영되고 있는 직업성 천식 감시 체계나 이소이사네이트 노출 근로자들을 대상으로 한 연구를 통 해 직업성 천식 사례들이 보고되고 있으나, 특수건강진단에 의한 직업성 천식진단 및 판정 사례는 매우 드물다 [12,13,15] 3) 폐기능 환기장애 분류 폐활량검사에서 노력성폐활량(forced vital capacity, FVC), 1초 간 노력성호기량(forced expiratory volume in 1 second, FEV1)의 비정상 기준은 80% 미만으로 하였으며 [16,17], 일초율(FEV1/FVC) 은 70% 미만을 비정상으로 하였다 [18][19][20]. 폐기능 환기장애 분류 는 1) 정상(FVC ≥80% and FEV1/FVC ≥70%), 2) 제한형 환기장 애(FVC < 80% and FEV1/FVC ≥70%), 3) 폐쇄형 환기장애(FVC ≥80% and FEV1/FVC < 70%), 4) 혼합형 환기장애(FVC < 80% and FEV1/FVC < 70%)로 분류하였다 [18,21] 을 보이지 않아 NSBH 및 PEFR을 실시하지 않았다(Fig.…”
unclassified