Surveillance Mammography following the Treatment of Primary Breast Cancer with Breast Reconstruction: A Systematic Review

Barnsley, G Philip; Grunfeld, Eva; Coyle, Doug; Paszat, Lawrence

doi:10.1097/01.prs.0000279143.66781.9a

Cited by 37 publications

(26 citation statements)

References 42 publications

(55 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…53,54,56,59,60 Only six studies reported data on numbers of patients experiencing IBTR and/or MCBC events. [53][54][55][56][57][58] The paucity of the underlying evidence base mirrors the findings of previous reviews 4,29,[43][44][45][46][47] described earlier. Nevertheless, a number of conclusions may be drawn.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 48%

“…It is unclear which of these alternative methods of organising a service represent the most effective and efficient regimen. Previous systematic reviews 4,29,[43][44][45][46][47] have been unable to clarify the optimal frequency and duration of surveillance mammography.…”

Section: Overviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Only Grunfeld and colleagues, 47 Montgomery and colleagues 46 and Barnsley and colleagues 43 specifically considered the role of mammography in surveillance, and Barnsley and colleagues 43 focused solely on surveillance mammography of the reconstructed breast, concluding that certain local recurrences are detectable by surveillance mammography but that there is a paucity of evidence.…”

Section: Decision Problemmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The American Society of Clinical Oncology 28 recommended in 2006 that surveillance should include annual mammography, although acknowledging that there is a lack of high level evidence to support decisions about the frequency and timing of mammographic surveillance. Seven reviews, 4,29,41,[43][44][45][46][47][48] of varying methodological quality, have summarised the evidence of the effectiveness of differing surveillance regimens after treatment for breast cancer.…”

Section: Decision Problemmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of different surveillance mammography regimens after the treatment for primary breast cancer: systematic reviews, registry database analyses and economic evaluation

2012

Clinical Governance: An International Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

How to obtain copies of this and other HTA programme reports An electronic version of this title, in Adobe Acrobat format, is available for downloading free of charge for personal use from the HTA website (www.hta.ac.uk). A fully searchable DVD is also available (see below).Printed copies of HTA journal series issues cost £20 each (post and packing free in the UK) to both public and private sector purchasers from our despatch agents.Non-UK purchasers will have to pay a small fee for post and packing. For European countries the cost is £2 per issue and for the rest of the world £3 per issue. How to order:-fax (with credit card details) -post (with credit card details or cheque) -phone during office hours (credit card only).Additionally the HTA website allows you to either print out your order or download a blank order form. Contact details are as follows:Synergie UK (HTA Department) Digital House, The Loddon Centre Wade Road Basingstoke Hants RG24 8QW Email: orders@hta.ac.uk Tel: 0845 812 4000 -ask for 'HTA Payment Services' (out-of-hours answer-phone service) Fax: 0845 812 4001 -put 'HTA Order' on the fax header Payment methods Paying by chequeIf you pay by cheque, the cheque must be in pounds sterling, made payable to University of Southampton and drawn on a bank with a UK address.Paying by credit card You can order using your credit card by phone, fax or post. SubscriptionsNHS libraries can subscribe free of charge. Public libraries can subscribe at a reduced cost of £100 for each volume (normally comprising 40-50 titles). The commercial subscription rate is £400 per volume (addresses within the UK) and £600 per volume (addresses outside the UK). Please see our website for details. Subscriptions can be purchased only for the current or forthcoming volume.How do I get a copy of HTA on DVD?Please use the form on the HTA website (www.hta.ac.uk/htacd/index.shtml). HTA on DVD is currently free of charge worldwide.The website also provides information about the HTA programme and lists the membership of the various committees. HTAThe clinical effectiveness and costeffectiveness of different surveillance mammography regimens after the treatment for primary breast cancer: systematic reviews, registry database analyses and economic evaluation NIHR Health Technology Assessment programmeThe Health Technology Assessment (HTA) programme, part of the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR), was set up in 1993. It produces high-quality research information on the effectiveness, costs and broader impact of health technologies for those who use, manage and provide care in the NHS. 'Health technologies' are broadly defined as all interventions used to promote health, prevent and treat disease, and improve rehabilitation and long-term care. The research findings from the HTA programme directly influence decision-making bodies such as the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) and the National Screening Committee (NSC). HTA findings also help to improve the quality of clinical practice in the NHS indir...

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 48%

Section: Overviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Decision Problemmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Decision Problemmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of different surveillance mammography regimens after the treatment for primary breast cancer: systematic reviews, registry database analyses and economic evaluation

2012

Clinical Governance: An International Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Among 54 (24%) patients who presented with symptoms relating to breast reconstructions (most commonly lump or swelling), one-half were subsequently found to have no significant abnormality and one-third (29%) were found to have fat necrosis. Only four recurrences were found (105). Presently, assessment with ultrasound and mammography can only be supported in symptomatic patients, with surgical referral the most efficient means of obtaining a diagnosis while minimizing unnecessary tests or biopsies (106).…”

Section: What Is the Appropriate Post-breast Reconstruction Survmentioning

confidence: 99%

Breast reconstruction following prophylactic or therapeutic mastectomy for breast cancer: Recommendations from an evidence-based provincial guideline

Budgell¹,

Quan²,

Mehling³

et al. 2014

CAN J PLAST SURG

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Monitoring and Surveillance Following DCIS Treatment

Zakhireh

Hwang

2015

Ductal Carcinoma in Situ and Microinvasive/Borderline Breast Cancer

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Surveillance Mammography following the Treatment of Primary Breast Cancer with Breast Reconstruction: A Systematic Review

Abstract: This study has demonstrated the paucity of evidence and highlighted the need for further research to evaluate this issue.

Cited by 37 publications

References 42 publications

The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of different surveillance mammography regimens after the treatment for primary breast cancer: systematic reviews, registry database analyses and economic evaluation

The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of different surveillance mammography regimens after the treatment for primary breast cancer: systematic reviews, registry database analyses and economic evaluation

Breast reconstruction following prophylactic or therapeutic mastectomy for breast cancer: Recommendations from an evidence-based provincial guideline

Monitoring and Surveillance Following DCIS Treatment

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About