2014
DOI: 10.4172/plastic-surgery.1000858
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Breast reconstruction following prophylactic or therapeutic mastectomy for breast cancer: Recommendations from an evidence-based provincial guideline

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
(91 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…16,[19][20][21][22] Notably, several authors have suggested that autologous tissue reconstruction is preferable to implant-based reconstruction in the setting of radiation. 15,[23][24][25][26][27] Given that the safety profile and optimal timing of radiation in the setting of breast reconstruction remains controversial, 8,11,[28][29][30] should radiation patterns change, the rates of complications with implant-based reconstruction in the setting of radiation may also change.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…16,[19][20][21][22] Notably, several authors have suggested that autologous tissue reconstruction is preferable to implant-based reconstruction in the setting of radiation. 15,[23][24][25][26][27] Given that the safety profile and optimal timing of radiation in the setting of breast reconstruction remains controversial, 8,11,[28][29][30] should radiation patterns change, the rates of complications with implant-based reconstruction in the setting of radiation may also change.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although studies have shown that increased body mass index (BMI), smoking, and radiation are associated with more complications in implant-based reconstruction, characterization of breast implant failures and subsequent tissue salvages have been limited due to the small sample sizes in these studies. [8][9][10][11][12][13][14] When implant-based reconstruction fails, one option is to remove the implant and perform tissue flap reconstruction as a salvage procedure. It is unknown how frequently this occurs or if it is associated with success rates similar to primary flap reconstruction.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Soft‐tissue defects can be found in various pathologic cases . Fat grafting or lipotransfer, has become an integral part of a plastic surgeon's armamentarium for resolving both aesthetic and reconstructive problems.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More importantly, these patients are significantly more likely to receive IBR 15,19,31 compared with patients with invasive cancer, and often are considered to be appropriate candidates for IBR. With regard to our examination of the receipt of IBR across Medicaid hospital status, we mitigated any aforementioned confounding (lack of cancer stage information in the NIS data set) by calculating the IBR rates only for patients with an increased risk of breast cancer and/or in situ disease (ie, prophylactic IBR and IBR for noninvasive cancer, respectively).…”
Section: Outcomes Of Interestmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other words, do Medicaid beneficiaries endure IBR disparities because they pursue treatment, or "cluster," at HMHs? 19 Reasons include concerns regarding delaying the onset of adjuvant therapy due to IBR-related complications and a higher likelihood of needing postoperative radiotherapy, which might compromise esthetic outcomes 20 and increase complication rates. 15 However, these results are highly susceptible to confounding from the lack of clinical cancer stage information in the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database and the fact that Medicaid patients have more locally advanced cancers at the time of their initial presentation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%