Surveillance infrastructure in China: Key concepts and mechanisms enhancing the Party-state’s governance ambitions

Abstract

Surveillance infrastructure in China monitors and enables authorities to react to potential risky, miscreant or criminal behaviour. What type of behaviours are perceived to be so, is determined in large part by ideology. Therefore, surveillance infrastructure relies on the machinery of ideology to define the boundaries of its use. In this paper, we outline six key ideological concepts relating to governance in Xi Jinping’s China that have helped to expand the boundaries of surveillance. We identify terms embedded in promotional material of Hikvision and other surveillance technology firms as a springboard for conceptual discussion. The aim is to survey the ideological lexicon of concepts that position surveillance within the Party-state’s broad capacity-building ambitions for governance in Xi’s China. This positioning amplifies the political responsibility of state, social and market actors to work together to broaden surveillance activities for ‘society-building’ purposes, and ultimately for the realisation of Xi Jinping’s goal of National Rejuvenation.

Technologies of migration and citizenship: Life and work at the base of Shanghai’s digital infrastructure stack

“…One key example in contemporary urban China is the way that high-bandwidth fiber-optic installations have enabled various forms of urban management technology, including but not limited to video surveillance (Caprotti & Liu, 2022). Underlying the forms of “social construction” implied by surveillance infrastructure manufacturers (Trevaskes and Bernot, 2023, this issue), surveillance infrastructure relies on fiber-optic networks to function: monitoring often require direct wired links for access and control wired linkages for access and control, but are not (or are not intended to be) directly accessible to the public internet. In the context of the classed urban formations that are at the core of Chinese urban spatial design, the installation of surveillance cameras in walled downtown compounds manufactures feelings of urban security.…”

Connectivity, centrality, and adaptation: The coproduction of political space in China’s standardization of autonomous driving technologies

“…For China, innovation in autonomous driving should benefit from a "scientific, open, and harmonious standards, regulations and policy environment" (ASRI, 2018, emphasis). But China's ideal of harmony-"the pursuit of peaceful coexistence while respecting differences" (Dunford & Liu, 2019, p. 152; see also Trevaskes & Bernot, 2023, this issue)-seems to be quite out of reach when it comes to international standardization. China's state-owned newspaper Global Times thus commented on China's national standardization strategy: "In the current international geopolitical environment, China Standards 2035 will likely spark another round of containment attacks from the US.…”