Surrogate Model-Based Optimization Framework: A Case Study in Aerospace Design

Abstract

Summary. Surrogate-based optimization has proven very useful for novel or exploratory design tasks because it offers a global view of the characteristics of the design space, and it enables one to refine the design of experiments, conduct sensitivity analyses, characterize tradeoffs between multiple objectives, and, if necessary, help modify the design space. In this article, a framework is presented for design optimization on problems that involve two or more objectives which may be conflicting in nature. The applicability of the framework is demonstrated using a case study in space propulsion: a response surface-based multi-objective optimization of a radial turbine for an expander cycle-type liquid rocket engine. The surrogate model is combined with a genetic algorithm-based Pareto front construction and can be effective in supporting global sensitivity evaluations. In this case study, due to the lack of established experiences in adopting radial turbines for space propulsion, much of the original design space, generated based on intuitive ideas from the designer, violated established design constraints. Response surfaces were successfully used to define previously unknown feasible design space boundaries. Once a feasible design space was identified, the optimization framework was followed, which led to the construction of the Pareto front using genetic algorithms. The optimization framework was effectively utilized to achieve a substantial performance improvement and to reveal important physics in the design. IntroductionWith continuing progress in computational simulations, computational-based optimization has proven to be a useful tool in reducing the design process duration and expense. Numerous methods exist for conducting design optimizations. Popular methods include gradient-based methods [4,14], adjoint methods [6,10], and surrogate model-based optimization methods such as the response surface approximation (RSA) [9]. Gradient-based methods rely on a

Determination of the Constants of GTN Damage Model Using Experiment, Polynomial Regression and Kriging Methods

“…It is simply a numerical approximation of how an entity varies when the entities that affect it are varied. This method has also been widely employed to evaluate the numerical predictions which are calculated by expensive codes such as computational fluid dynamics (CFD) and nonlinear finite element method (NFEM) to speed up the analyzing process [22][23][24]. For implementing the surrogate-based optimization technique in a numerical simulation, the following steps should be taken [24,25]:…”

A Novel Hybrid Algorithm for Solving Multiobjective Optimization Problems with Engineering Applications

“…The mathematical expressions for the two objectives in terms of the four variables are stated as (31) and (32). In addition, the approximate mode of the constraint function is presented in expression (33 …”

“…The surrogate model method has been properly utilized to simplify practical models in design problems [33,34]. A surrogateassisted evolution strategy was proposed and applied to multiobjective optimization [35].…”

The State-of-the-Art on Framework of Vibration-Based Structural Damage Identification for Decision Making

“…Meta-models have been extensively used in the design and optimization of computationally expensive problems. Different meta-models have been shown to perform well in different conditions, such as the response surface method (RSM) [118][119][120][121][122][123][124][125], Kriging method [126,127], radial basis function method (RBF) [128], and feed-forward neural network [129]. Li and Padula [130] and Queipo et al [131] recently reviewed different surrogate models used in the aerospace industry, and Chen et al [132] summarized the characteristics of different meta-model types and the experiment designs for fitting them.…”