2016
DOI: 10.1509/jppm.15.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surrendering Information through the Looking Glass: Transparency, Trust, and Protection

Abstract: Trust and transparency influence consumer information exchanges, yet the understanding of how they shape marketing and public policy relating to privacy and security issues is not current with the digital and informational age. People face increasing complexity in online exchanges of information and lack the time, attention, and wherewithal to understand how to protect themselves. Society's reliance on technology results in individuals engaging in continuous partial attention and behaving as cognitive misers. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
88
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(94 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
(72 reference statements)
1
88
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We refer to this tendency to rely on algorithmically generated recommendations even when they are inferior as algorithm overdependence. Prior research has conjectured that consumers "surrender to technology" in modern digital environments because they have excessive faith within online information exchanges, leading them to unwittingly give up sensitive personal information (Walker 2016). Positing that users face the most significant privacy vulnerabilities when factors related to the complexity (i.e., user cognitive limitations) and context (i.e., marketplace asymmetries) of the information exchange coincide, the surrendering-to-technology framework has reshaped how policy makers address such risks.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We refer to this tendency to rely on algorithmically generated recommendations even when they are inferior as algorithm overdependence. Prior research has conjectured that consumers "surrender to technology" in modern digital environments because they have excessive faith within online information exchanges, leading them to unwittingly give up sensitive personal information (Walker 2016). Positing that users face the most significant privacy vulnerabilities when factors related to the complexity (i.e., user cognitive limitations) and context (i.e., marketplace asymmetries) of the information exchange coincide, the surrendering-to-technology framework has reshaped how policy makers address such risks.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is noteworthy that the Blockchain implementation allows for trust increase while maintaining full anonymity of the individuals. This is important as recent discussion on mechanisms to improve trust have raised debates on whether transparency is useful for trust increase (Walker, 2016). While longstanding belief among researchers was that increased transparency leads to increased trust (Grimmelikhuijsen, 2012b), some works argue that indeed the opposite is true (Grimmelikhuijsen, 2012a).…”
Section: Recovery Of Trustmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It assumes individual control over the collection, processing, and storage of personal information, as well as awareness and control over the use and dissemination of this information (Walker 2016;Weinberg et al 2015;Ziegeldorf et al 2014). In this context, researchers note that regulations are not in correlation with the advances in the market, due to information overload, unclear information use, and the speed with which data are exchanged (Adams 2017;Walker 2016). Because of this, consumers are even less likely to know that their information has been breached or shared.…”
Section: Data Privacy In the Internet Of Thingsmentioning
confidence: 99%