2015
DOI: 10.1080/21650349.2015.1090913
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surprise and design creativity: investigating the drivers of unexpectedness

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
(34 reference statements)
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“… Visual aspects play a role in people's behaviour and products' acceptance, as stressed particularly by Haug (2016).  A consumer's purchase decision is affected by the psychological response induced by a product's aesthetics (Chen and Chang, 2016), which may give rise to different perceptions according to the way a product is observed and experienced.…”
Section: Literature Gap and Importance To Address Itmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“… Visual aspects play a role in people's behaviour and products' acceptance, as stressed particularly by Haug (2016).  A consumer's purchase decision is affected by the psychological response induced by a product's aesthetics (Chen and Chang, 2016), which may give rise to different perceptions according to the way a product is observed and experienced.…”
Section: Literature Gap and Importance To Address Itmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evaluations are valuable especially if designs exhibit remarkably unusual features or structural elements. Those are indeed featured by the chance to conflict with habits (Becattini et al, 2017) and give rise to bewilderment. In this context, the importance of designs' evaluation is stressed by Arrighi et al (2015), who hypothesize that it is possible to improve designs and save resources with an earlier involvement of the user in the design process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“….) (Wiggins, 2006;Macedo et al, 2009;Thagard and Stewart, 2011;Becattini et al, 2017) as well as the reception of the artistic output (e.g., awe, being moved, thrills) (Konečni, 2005;Schubert, 2009Schubert, -2010Schubert et al, 2016). Fortunately, there is a straightforward theory about the underlying mental mechanism of positive affect that has been applied to the spreading activation model.…”
Section: The Dilemma Of Usefulness In Creativitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a growing body of evidence that the mental processing and outcomes of creativity generate positive affect ( Russ, 1999 ; Henderson, 2004 ; Amabile et al, 2005 ; Bledow et al, 2013 ; Tavares, 2016 ; Gu et al, 2018 ). Positive affect is a broader concept than satisfaction, incorporating experiences reported as a result of the creative process (such as “aha,” “wow,” surprise, …) ( Wiggins, 2006 ; Macedo et al, 2009 ; Thagard and Stewart, 2011 ; Becattini et al, 2017 ) as well as the reception of the artistic output (e.g., awe, being moved, thrills) ( Konečni, 2005 ; Schubert, 2009-2010 ; Schubert et al, 2016 ). Fortunately, there is a straightforward theory about the underlying mental mechanism of positive affect that has been applied to the spreading activation model.…”
Section: The Dilemma Of Usefulness In Creativitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sarkar & Chakrabarti (2011) proposed a first scale to evaluate the level of novelty of a product based on different combinations of the previous factors and later, Jagtap (2016) proposed a modification to that scale to incorporate more levels. In terms of surprise, Becattini et al (2017) have proposed the most complete classification to date, of factors affecting the surprise triggered by products. They propose 3 main categories:…”
Section: Novelty Of Tangible Productsmentioning
confidence: 99%