2000
DOI: 10.1055/s-2008-1072315
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surgical Treatment of Diaphragmatic Agenesis by Transposition of a Muscle Flap: Report on 15 Cases

Abstract: Between 1987 and 1996 the transposition of a muscle flap using the anterolateral abdominal wall (the internal oblique and transversus abdominus muscle) has been used for the surgical treatment of fifteen cases of diaphragmatic agenesis. There are several advantages of this technique: a more accurate reconstruction of the diaphragmatic dome, a better adapted muscle flap, good tolerance and evolution as a result of the use of autologous material with thus less risk of recurrence and/or infection. The disadvantag… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are very few reports in which this procedure was applied to a Re-CDH with a large diaphragmatic defect [9]. The AMF procedure also has some benefits in that this muscle flap is the patient's own vascularized muscle and can easily close the defect without tension, resulting in less chance of a recurrence of CDH [6][7][8][9][10][11]. In fact, in all 4 of the patients on whom we performed this procedure, we have not experienced any recurrence.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…There are very few reports in which this procedure was applied to a Re-CDH with a large diaphragmatic defect [9]. The AMF procedure also has some benefits in that this muscle flap is the patient's own vascularized muscle and can easily close the defect without tension, resulting in less chance of a recurrence of CDH [6][7][8][9][10][11]. In fact, in all 4 of the patients on whom we performed this procedure, we have not experienced any recurrence.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…The disadvantage of it is thought to be performing by the thoracic approach and the deformity of the thoracic shape after the procedure [2,5]. In contrast, the AMF we used is also known to be a primary procedure for a CDH with a large diaphragmatic defect [6][7][8][9][10][11]. There are very few reports in which this procedure was applied to a Re-CDH with a large diaphragmatic defect [9].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We describe the repair of nine such defects by using an abdominal muscle flap comprising the transversus abdominis and internal oblique muscles based on the intercostal and subcostal vessels. Although reports of similar flap repairs have been published in the literature [1][2][3][4][5], these employed a subcostal incision for abdominal entry, which we believe jeopardizes the flap's vascularity. Thus, we prefer to use an upper abdominal midline incision for abdominal entry in all cases of CDH and DE.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%