2021
DOI: 10.5334/aogh.3413
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surgical Site Infections and Antimicrobial Resistance After Cesarean Section Delivery in Rural Rwanda

Abstract: Background: As the volume of surgical cases in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) increases, surgical-site infections (SSIs) are becoming more prevalent with anecdotal evidence of antimicrobial resistance (AMR), despite a paucity of data on resistance patterns. Objectives: As a primary objective, this prospective study aimed to describe the epidemiology of SSIs and the associated AMR among women who delivered by cesarean at a rural Rwandan hospital. As secondary o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

8
13
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
8
13
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In developing countries, there is a high risk of antimicrobial resistance, due to the misuse of antimicrobials, over-the-counter availability, non-compliance, and unregulated supply chains [33]. To illustrate this, a previous study in Rwanda found that 84.6-100% of the infected CS cases were resistant to commonly used antibiotics (ampicillin, ceftriaxone, and cefepime) [34]. Infections arose despite 88.8% of the cohort receiving pre-operative antibiotics (94% ampicillin) and 95.9% receiving postoperative antibiotics (52.3% ampicillin, 48.1% gentamicin, 46.3% metronidazole, and 41.3% ceftriaxone) [34].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In developing countries, there is a high risk of antimicrobial resistance, due to the misuse of antimicrobials, over-the-counter availability, non-compliance, and unregulated supply chains [33]. To illustrate this, a previous study in Rwanda found that 84.6-100% of the infected CS cases were resistant to commonly used antibiotics (ampicillin, ceftriaxone, and cefepime) [34]. Infections arose despite 88.8% of the cohort receiving pre-operative antibiotics (94% ampicillin) and 95.9% receiving postoperative antibiotics (52.3% ampicillin, 48.1% gentamicin, 46.3% metronidazole, and 41.3% ceftriaxone) [34].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To illustrate this, a previous study in Rwanda found that 84.6-100% of the infected CS cases were resistant to commonly used antibiotics (ampicillin, ceftriaxone, and cefepime) [34]. Infections arose despite 88.8% of the cohort receiving pre-operative antibiotics (94% ampicillin) and 95.9% receiving postoperative antibiotics (52.3% ampicillin, 48.1% gentamicin, 46.3% metronidazole, and 41.3% ceftriaxone) [34]. Another advantage of MGH over antibiotics is that MGH will not end up in the circulation of the patient, and subsequently, in the milk of breastfeeding women.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A third limitation is that the gold standard for SSI diagnosis is a GP physical examination, without isolating pathological organisms through swab or fluid culture. Due to lack of infrastructure for pathology confirmations, this is the main means of SSI diagnosis in this rural hospital, similar to many other rural SSA settings 48 49. Since we are interested in identifying strategies that imitate a facility visit without the burden of travel, the GP diagnosis is a suitable gold standard in this context.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, many rural health facilities in LMICs do not have access to bacteriology labs and we found establishing such capacity incredibly challenging [12]. Further, even when available, non-pathogenic bacteria can be misdetected on wound swabs, adding uncertainty to diagnoses [13]. In rural Rwanda, SSI by clinical diagnosis is standard of care and for our algorithm development, we used this clinical diagnosis as the gold standard, as this replicates what the patient would have received if she returned to the facility for wound monitoring.…”
mentioning
confidence: 92%