2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2017.07.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surgical site infection reduction bundle in patients with gynecologic cancer undergoing colon surgery

Abstract: Objective Surgical site infections (SSIs) can lead to substantial morbidity, prolonged hospitalization, increased costs, and death in patients undergoing colorectal procedures. We sought to investigate the effect of using an SSI reduction bundle on the rate of SSIs in gynecologic cancer patients undergoing colon surgery. Methods We identified all gynecologic cancer patients who underwent colon resection at our institution from 2014–2016, during which time a service-wide SSI reduction bundle was introduced. T… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
(47 reference statements)
0
15
1
Order By: Relevance
“…SSI reduction was greatest in patients who underwent colon resection, from 33% to 7% (OR 0.14, 95% CI 0.037-0.53, p = 0.001). In a study of patients with gynaecologic cancer undergoing colon surgery, the incidence of SSI was reduced from 37% to 12% with bundles using 4% chlorhexidine antibacterial solution [32]. In the present study, there was no significant difference between povidone-iodine and chlorhexidine solutions in general.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 55%
“…SSI reduction was greatest in patients who underwent colon resection, from 33% to 7% (OR 0.14, 95% CI 0.037-0.53, p = 0.001). In a study of patients with gynaecologic cancer undergoing colon surgery, the incidence of SSI was reduced from 37% to 12% with bundles using 4% chlorhexidine antibacterial solution [32]. In the present study, there was no significant difference between povidone-iodine and chlorhexidine solutions in general.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 55%
“…Despite the heterogeneity there was significant reduction in the risk of SSIs by 46% (RR=0.54; 95% CI, 0.46-0.64; p<.00001, I 2 =73%) (Figure 2). 22 of the 25 studies had a statistically significant decrease in overall SSI rates following bundle implementation [16][17][18][19][20][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38]. Two studies showed no effect [21,40] and Anthony, et al 2011 [15] reported a statistically significant increase in SSI after bundle implementation.…”
Section: Wound Bundle and Their Effect On Surgical Site Infection Ratesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result of implementing enhanced recovery pathways with multimodal analgesia, multiple single‐centre studies have shown significant reductions of peri‐operative opioid requirements and lower reported pain scores in gynaecologic patients who underwent laparotomy when compared with historical controls who had the same procedure without a pathway in place [28–30]. Studies have also reported statistically significant reductions in 30‐day surgical site infection risk among patients undergoing these procedures and have reported success with specific interventions including: setting patient and caregiver expectations; early patient education; pre‐operative antimicrobial washing; and timely administration of prophylactic antibiotics before surgery [31–33].…”
Section: Reporting Outcome Benefits Of Enhanced Recoverymentioning
confidence: 99%