Abstract:Surgical repair of pectus excavatum can significantly improve the body image difficulties and limitations on physical activity experienced by patients. These results should prompt physicians to consider the physiologic and psychological implications of pectus excavatum just as they would any other physical deformity known to have such consequences.
“…The methods of assessing pain separately in children 8 to 21 years of age and a parent for the first 30 days post operation have been reported. 2 Patients were followed via phone, mail, or clinical visit at yearly intervals, on or near the anniversary of their surgery, for a period of up to 5 years for complications.…”
Section: Cohort Management and Retentionmentioning
BACKGROUND: A multicenter study of pectus excavatum was described previously. This report presents our final results. STUDY DESIGN: Patients treated surgically at 11 centers were followed prospectively. Each underwent a preoperative evaluation with CT scan, pulmonary function tests, and body image survey. Data were collected about associated conditions, complications, and perioperative pain. One year after treatment, patients underwent repeat chest CT scan, pulmonary function tests, and body image survey. A subset of 50 underwent exercise pulmonary function testing.
“…The methods of assessing pain separately in children 8 to 21 years of age and a parent for the first 30 days post operation have been reported. 2 Patients were followed via phone, mail, or clinical visit at yearly intervals, on or near the anniversary of their surgery, for a period of up to 5 years for complications.…”
Section: Cohort Management and Retentionmentioning
BACKGROUND: A multicenter study of pectus excavatum was described previously. This report presents our final results. STUDY DESIGN: Patients treated surgically at 11 centers were followed prospectively. Each underwent a preoperative evaluation with CT scan, pulmonary function tests, and body image survey. Data were collected about associated conditions, complications, and perioperative pain. One year after treatment, patients underwent repeat chest CT scan, pulmonary function tests, and body image survey. A subset of 50 underwent exercise pulmonary function testing.
“…There is currently no data evaluating the effects of regular psychiatric followup with a psychiatrist on alleviating the psychological burden of poor body image in this patient group. Nevertheless, the lack of correlation between the anatomic severity of the deformity on CT and the physical and body image components of the child psychosocial assessment scores (r = 0.01 and r = 0.06, respectively) observed by Kelly et al suggests that presence of the deformity, regardless of severity, results in body image and psychosocial difficulties worthy of attention [22]. These authors also found that at one year post surgery, patients reported significant reductions in body image concerns (p < 0.0001) and in difficulties in physical functioning (p < 0.0001), and parents perceived significant improvements in their child's emotional functioning (p < 0.01), confirming psychosocial improvements with treatment, independent of the modality employed [22].…”
Section: Indications For the Treatment Of Pectus Deformitymentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Nevertheless, the lack of correlation between the anatomic severity of the deformity on CT and the physical and body image components of the child psychosocial assessment scores (r = 0.01 and r = 0.06, respectively) observed by Kelly et al suggests that presence of the deformity, regardless of severity, results in body image and psychosocial difficulties worthy of attention [22]. These authors also found that at one year post surgery, patients reported significant reductions in body image concerns (p < 0.0001) and in difficulties in physical functioning (p < 0.0001), and parents perceived significant improvements in their child's emotional functioning (p < 0.01), confirming psychosocial improvements with treatment, independent of the modality employed [22]. Similarly, Krasopoulos et al have reported a statistically significant improvement in the self-esteem of pectus deformity patients after having undergone reparative surgery (p = 0.001) [24].…”
Section: Indications For the Treatment Of Pectus Deformitymentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Despite the fact that Kelly et al did not explicitly reference poor body image as an indication for repair, body image concerns constitute an important consideration in the pectus deformity patient population. Impairments in psychosocial functioning secondary to poor body image should be explored during the work-up of a pectus deformity patient, as surgical repair of pectus deformity may help to alleviate these concerns [12,[22][23][24]. There is currently no data evaluating the effects of regular psychiatric followup with a psychiatrist on alleviating the psychological burden of poor body image in this patient group.…”
Section: Indications For the Treatment Of Pectus Deformitymentioning
Pectus excavatum (PE) and pectus carinatum (PC) are relatively common deformities involving the anterior chest wall, occurring in 1:1000 and 1:1500 live births, respectively. While the etiology remains an enigma, the association of pectus deformities with other skeletal abnormalities suggests that connective tissue disease may play a role in their pathogenesis. Clinical features of these deformities vary with severity, as determined by the Haller index and Backer ratio, but frequently include cardiac and respiratory abnormalities. Importantly, there exist profound psychosocial implications for children afflicted with these deformities, including but not limited to feelings of embarrassment and maladaptive social behaviors. These debilitating characteristics have prompted the development of novel medical and surgical corrective techniques. The correction of pectus deformities reduces the incidence of physiological complications secondary to chest wall malformation, while simultaneously improving body image and psychosocial development in the affected pediatric population. The Ravitch (open) and Nuss (minimally invasive) procedures remain the most frequently employed methods of pectus deformity repair, with no difference in overall complication rates, though individual complication rates vary with treatment. The Nuss procedure is associated with a higher rate of recurrence due to bar migration, hemothorax, and pneumothorax. Postoperative pain management is markedly more difficult in patients who have undergone Nuss repair. Patients undergoing the Ravitch procedure require less postoperative analgesia, but have longer operation times and a larger surgical scar. The cosmetic results of the Nuss procedure and its minimally invasive nature make it preferable to the Ravitch repair. Newer treatment modalities, including the vacuum bell, magnetic mini-mover procedure (3MP), and dynamic compression bracing (DCB) appear promising, and may ultimately provide effective methods of noninvasive repair. However, these modalities suffer from a lack of extensive published evidence, and the limited number of studies currently published fail to adequately define their long-term effectiveness.
“…Patients may also increasingly report musculoskeletal complaints, such as back and chest pain, or cardiopulmonary complaints such as dyspnea on exertion and diminished exercise tolerance, which may be related to decreased pulmonary reserve, decreased forced vital capacity, decreased maximal voluntary ventilation, or limitation of cardiac stroke volume (8,9). Furthermore, patients with significant pectus deformities may report palpitations related to mitral valve prolapse, arrhythmias, and atrial & ventricular compression.…”
Section: Brief Report On Thoracic Surgerymentioning
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.