2004
DOI: 10.1159/000080203
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surgical Management of Large Sessile Villous and Tubulovillous Adenomas of the Lower Rectum

Abstract: Background: Large sessile adenomas of the rectum are premalignant lesions necessitating complete removal. Methods: We reviewed the data on 20 consecutive patients with large (≧2 cm) sessile villous and tubulovillous adenomas of the lower two thirds of the rectum (≤11 cm from the anal verge). Median (range) adenoma diameter and distance from the anal verge were 5 (2–8) and 7 (4–11) cm, respectively. All 11 patients with an adenomatous circumferential involvement of ≧50% or an endosonographic staging of ≧uT2 und… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Removal of preneoplastic lesions such as adenomas is thought to be crucial in preventing colorectal cancer. In fact, adenomas of the colon and rectum have the potential to become malignant; this potential is related to size, histological type (villous adenoma), and grade of dysplasia [4][5][6].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Removal of preneoplastic lesions such as adenomas is thought to be crucial in preventing colorectal cancer. In fact, adenomas of the colon and rectum have the potential to become malignant; this potential is related to size, histological type (villous adenoma), and grade of dysplasia [4][5][6].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM), which was described as an innovation in 1983 by Buess et al [1, 2], can be regarded as the first approach to pure natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) and single‐port surgery (SPS) [3, 4]. Despite the advantages of classical TEM and its superiority compared with conventional transanal excision [5, 6], including our own concept [7], some difficulties remain, detaining this technique from widespread adoption. The main reasons are the high costs of investment for the required specific TEM devices [8, 9], the long learning curve due to the demanding and inconvenient technique [10, 11], and the at least temporary fecal incontinence in some patients caused by anal dilatation and insertion of the large metal tube [11, 12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%