The significance and the informative value of risk and protective factor combinations, e.g., for selective ultrasound surveys, are limited. Early universal ultrasound screening using the Graf method is advised to timely detect hip immaturity and pathologies and to provide the optimal approach for mature or immature but appropriate for age and pathologic hips. What is Known: • Ultrasound screening is essential for diagnosis and treatment of DDH in time while the weighting and correlation of protective factors and perinatal risk and their role for the ultrasound screening protocol still give rise to debate. What is New: • The effects of single risk and protective factors for DDH do not cumulate or counteract, resulting in a limited value of a selective screening protocol based on risk and protective factors. • A universal screening protocol using the Graf ultrasound method is recommended.

BACKGROUND: The optimum timing for temporary ileostomy closure after low anterior resection is still open. OBJECTIVE: This trial aimed to compare early (2 wk) versus late (12 wk) stoma closure. DESIGN: The study included 2 parallel groups in a multicenter, randomized controlled clinical trial. SETTINGS: The study was conducted at 3 Swiss hospitals. PATIENTS: Patients undergoing low anterior resection and temporary ileostomy for cancer were included. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomly allocated to early or late stoma closure. Before closure, colonic anastomosis was examined for integrity. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary efficacy outcome was the Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index 6 weeks after resection. Secondary end points included safety (morbidity), feasibility, and quality of life 4 months after low anterior resection. RESULTS: The trial was stopped for safety concerns after 71 patients were randomly assigned to early closure (37 patients) or late closure (34 patients). There were comparable baseline data between the groups. No difference in quality of life occurred 6 weeks (mean Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index: 99.8 vs 106.0; p = 0.139) and 4 months (108.6 vs 107.1; p = 0.904) after index surgery. Intraoperative tendency of oozing (visual analog scale: 35.8 vs 19.3; p = 0.011), adhesions (visual analog scale: 61.3 vs 46.2; p = 0.034), leak of colonic anastomosis (19% vs 0%; p = 0.012), leak of colonic or ileal anastomosis (24% vs 0%; p = 0.002), and reintervention (16% vs 0%; p = 0.026) were significantly higher after early closure. The concept of early closure failed in 10 patients (27% vs 0% in the late closure group (95% CI for the difference, 9.4%–44.4%)). LIMITATIONS: The trial was prematurely stopped because of safety issues. The aimed group size was not reached. CONCLUSIONS: Early stoma closure does not provide better quality of life up to 4 months after low anterior resection but is afflicted with significantly adverse feasibility and higher morbidity when compared with late closure. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B665 . CIERRE DE LA ILEOSTOMÍA TEMPORAL: 2 VERSUS 12 SEMANAS POSTERIOR A LA RESECCIÓN RECTAL POR CÁNCER: UNA ADVERTENCIA DE UN ESTUDIO MULTICÉNTRICO CONTROLADO RANDOMIZADO PROSPECTIVO ANTECEDENTES: El momento óptimo para el cierre temporal de la ileostomía posterior a la resección anterior baja es aun controversial. OBJETIVO: Este estudio tuvo como objetivo comparar el cierre del estom...

Visceral artery aneurysms are rare with an incidence of only 0.01–0.1% of the population. Open surgical or endovascular elimination should be performed for aneurysms greater than 2 cm in size. The risk of aneurysm rupture is then approximately 25–40%. If the aneurysm ruptures the mortality can be as high as 76%. For mycotic aneurysms or spurious aneurysms there is no lower limit to the diameter size for the need of treatment. Sudden abdominal pain during pregnancy can be caused by visceral artery aneurysms and must be further clarified. The indications for surgery during pregnancy should be made generously. The clinical symptoms (abdominal complaints) of visceral artery aneurysms are manifold. The treatment can be either an open surgical approach or endovascular treatment. In the emergency setting, if endovascular treatment is no longer possible, an open surgical treatment needs to be performed. There are so far no randomized studies which could identify one of the procedures (open surgery vs. endovascular surgery) as clearly being superior. The prognosis after treatment is satisfactory with a 5–10 year survival rate of approximately 90%.