2008
DOI: 10.1007/s00265-008-0571-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surgical examination of male genital function of calopterygid damselflies (Odonata)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Waage 1979aWaage ,b, 1986. Males can be categorized into three groups based on their sperm removal tactics: (i) males that gain physical access to the spermathecae, (ii) males that cannot physically remove sperm from the spermathecae, presumably because the spermathecal lumen is too narrow to allow the entry of the male genitalia and (iii) males that elicit sperm ejection from the spermathecae via female sensory stimulation (Waage 1979a(Waage ,b, 2004Siva-Jothy and Hooper 1995;Cordero and Andr es 2002;Cordero Rivera et al 2004;Tsuchiya and Hayashi 2008). Remarkable variation in sperm removal mechanisms has been described, even among closely related species (i.e.…”
Section: Evidence For Nonadaptive Diversification In Reproductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Waage 1979aWaage ,b, 1986. Males can be categorized into three groups based on their sperm removal tactics: (i) males that gain physical access to the spermathecae, (ii) males that cannot physically remove sperm from the spermathecae, presumably because the spermathecal lumen is too narrow to allow the entry of the male genitalia and (iii) males that elicit sperm ejection from the spermathecae via female sensory stimulation (Waage 1979a(Waage ,b, 2004Siva-Jothy and Hooper 1995;Cordero and Andr es 2002;Cordero Rivera et al 2004;Tsuchiya and Hayashi 2008). Remarkable variation in sperm removal mechanisms has been described, even among closely related species (i.e.…”
Section: Evidence For Nonadaptive Diversification In Reproductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these structures apparently do not have access to the spermatheca, since the sperm volume in this organ was similar for one-copulation females and for those interrupted at the end of stage I. This limited ability to remove spermathecal sperm has been previously found in some other odonates, such as the coenagrionids Ischnura elegans (Miller, 1987), and Ceriagrion tenellum (Andrés & Cordero-Rivera, 2000), and the calopterygids Mnais pruinosa (Siva-Jothy & Tsubaki, 1989;Tsuchiya & Hayashi, 2008) where females regain this control by impeding males from removing sperm from these organs (Córdoba-Aguilar & Cordero-Rivera, 2008). In this context, it is interesting to note that males of Calopteryx haemorrhoidalis asturica from Pontevedra, north-western Spain do not have access to the spermathecae, but the ejection of the rival sperm is induced by stimulation of the vaginal sensilla (Córdoba-Aguilar, 1999).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…However, it has been suggested that all sperm in the SPV are transferred to the female during the final stage of natural copulation [21]. Furthermore, the total duration of copulation is only 91 s in M. pruinosa and 254 s in C. cornelia [19]. Thus, the SPV is only used for short-term storage of sperm.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In M. pruinosa , the volume of sperm removed by males increases with the duration of copulation [27], such that removal is not complete for shorter copulations. In C. cornelia , BC sperm are usually removed completely, but SP sperm often remain [19]. Because sperm in the BC and SP are mixed [27], dilution occurs between newly received sperm and aged sperm already stored in the female, resulting in lower viability of the sperm within the female than in sperm transferred by males.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%