2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2007.01.065
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surgical Approach to Concealed Penis: Technical Refinements and Outcome

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
50
1
16

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
50
1
16
Order By: Relevance
“…[41] Moreover, since prepubic fat is sensitive to androgens, penile appearance can improve spontaneously as the child approaches puberty. [42,43] Alternatively, a true buried penis is due to superficial fascial laxity with lack of skin attachment to the shaft and subsequent absence of a peno-pubic and penoscrotal angle (Fig. 5A).…”
Section: Paraphimosismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…[41] Moreover, since prepubic fat is sensitive to androgens, penile appearance can improve spontaneously as the child approaches puberty. [42,43] Alternatively, a true buried penis is due to superficial fascial laxity with lack of skin attachment to the shaft and subsequent absence of a peno-pubic and penoscrotal angle (Fig. 5A).…”
Section: Paraphimosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The differential diagnosis between a buried penis due to pubic adiposity and one due to lack of skin attachments cannot be easily made. Borsellino et al [43] suggested that the presence of a circumferential groove at the base of the penis indicates normal peno-pubic and peno-scrotal angles.…”
Section: Clinical Assessment Of Inconspicuous Penismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, in adults it can cause chordee (Perlmutter and Chamberlain, 1972), discomfort during intercourse, difficulty in placing a condom, and psychological pressure brought about by cosmetic deformity, which can lead to demands for surgery. Converting a transverse penoscrotal incision to longitudinal closure or using the foreskin to augment the penile skin is among the surgical techniques described by others (Shepard et al, 1980;Medina López et al, 1999;Amano et al, 2004;Lee et al, 2005;Borsellino et al, 2007;El-Koutby and El Gohary, 2010). A circumferential incision made proximal to the coronal sulcus with skin flaps transferred to the ventral side of the penis has also been reported (Perlmutter and Chamberlain, 1972;Amano et al, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Surgical repair of the congenital abnormality is a difficult challenge for urologists. [3][4][5][6][7][8] Weight loss or removal of suprapubic fat usually fails to reach satisfactory result. Simple circumcision will make the condition worse.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%