1962
DOI: 10.1097/00006534-196203000-00005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surgical Anatomy of the Mandibular Ramus of the Facial Nerve Based on the Dissection of 100 Facial Halves

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
82
4
4

Year Published

1966
1966
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 256 publications
(96 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
6
82
4
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Till recently all the studies on marginal mandibular nerve was done on cadaveric tissue where the tissues are contracted and relatively immobile [3]. Dingman and Grabb described the nerve in relation to the lower border of mandible [4]. In his finding when the course of the marginal mandibular nerve was posterior to the facial artery, it was found to pass over the lower border of the mandible in 81% of dissected cadavers and in 19% one or two branches were found to course up to 1 cm below the rami of the mandible.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Till recently all the studies on marginal mandibular nerve was done on cadaveric tissue where the tissues are contracted and relatively immobile [3]. Dingman and Grabb described the nerve in relation to the lower border of mandible [4]. In his finding when the course of the marginal mandibular nerve was posterior to the facial artery, it was found to pass over the lower border of the mandible in 81% of dissected cadavers and in 19% one or two branches were found to course up to 1 cm below the rami of the mandible.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No significant difference was found according to gender [11]. Additionally, Dingman and Grabb [6] noticed that the RV was located on the medial side of the mandibular branch of the FN in 98% (98/100) and lateral in 2% (2/100) of the specimens. The observed relationship between the RV and FN was classified in 6 types by Touré and Vacher [19].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Locate the marginal mandibular branch using palpable reference points, reliable and easy to identify by clinical examination and surgical exploration. The number of branches Dingman and Grabb et al (1962) (1) described a single branch in 80% of 100 hemifaces of cadavers studied, two branches in 67% of cases, three branches in 9% of cases and four branches in 4% of cases. These results Concord with the study of Touré et al (2004) (6) carried out on 54 MMB, which found a single branch in 43% (12) joins the two previous studies and show that in 95% of 24 hemifaces studied the MMB had one or two branches.…”
Section: The Marking Triangle Of the Marginal Branch Of The Mandiblementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This result is close to that of Potgieter (2005) (6) made on 36 hemifaces human cadavers of which 78% of cases, the MMB was below LBM Study of Karapinar et al (2013) (17) Also found that in the 44 hemifaces of anatomical subjects studied, the MMB was still under the LBM. Yet the results of Dingman (1962) (1) Describe only 19% of cases below the LBM. The results of our study concerning the position of the furthest MMB below LBM varied between 1.7 and 2.2 cm.…”
Section: Relation Of the Mmb With The Lower Border Of The Mandiblementioning
confidence: 99%