1975
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.1.5957.559
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surgery of violence. IV. Blast injuries of the ear.

Abstract: The shock front of a blast wave is irregular and can be deflected by obstacles in its pathway, depending on their size and position. Consequently, the injurious effects of blast tend to be capricious, and one person may be unharmed while those around him are killed or severely injured.In most explosions solid material is changed suddenly into In considering injuries from different explosions there will be differences in the size of the bombs and in the explosive material used. In any specific explosion there a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

1978
1978
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These findings are not altogether surprising when considering that rupture of the TM requires greater pressure differentials than damage to the inner ear [27]. In addition, the factors that influence the type and degree of auditory damage, such as the duration and peak pressure of the blast wave as well as the orientation of the ear [5,[14][15], might also influence the effectiveness of hearing protection. Although modern hearing protection devices appear to mitigate ear injuries involving tinnitus, they may be ill-equipped to attenuate injuries resulting from more extreme pressure differentials experienced on the battlefield, such as TM rupture.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These findings are not altogether surprising when considering that rupture of the TM requires greater pressure differentials than damage to the inner ear [27]. In addition, the factors that influence the type and degree of auditory damage, such as the duration and peak pressure of the blast wave as well as the orientation of the ear [5,[14][15], might also influence the effectiveness of hearing protection. Although modern hearing protection devices appear to mitigate ear injuries involving tinnitus, they may be ill-equipped to attenuate injuries resulting from more extreme pressure differentials experienced on the battlefield, such as TM rupture.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Damage to these components of the auditory system may result in transient or permanent impairment, such as hearing loss and tinnitus (ringing in the ears) [15][16][17]. In 2010, hearing loss and tinnitus were the top two service-connected disabilities among veterans receiving compensation [18], and they are increasing at a dramatic rate [18][19][20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Damage to auditory components of the inner ear is of primary interest because it may be permanent and cause persistent symptoms of tinnitus [18][19][20] and hearing loss [6,17,[21][22][23]. Blast-related middle-ear damage has been associated with perforation of the tympanic membrane, although spontaneous recovery has been observed in the vast majority of injured patients [12,14,24]. Similarly, inner-ear temporary hearing shift caused by blast can improve slightly, but has not been reported to recover as predictably as middle-ear injuries.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[32][33][34] While most surgeons believe that a period of observation for spontaneous healing is prudent, there are arguments for both immediate and delayed tympanoplasty. [18][19][20] Advantages for immediate tympanoplasty following blast injury include the ability to perform meticulous debridement of foreign material and reapproximate trapdoor fragments of the TM, theoretically leading to more rapid healing and the prevention of future complications. 20 Kerr and Byrne concluded that surgical repair is indicated when a perforation fails to close spontaneously after 6 months.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reported spontaneous healing rates after blast-induced TM perforation range from 38% to 82%, and no consensus exits regarding the optimal time of observation prior to repair. 6,[17][18][19] There are arguments for both immediate and delayed tympanoplasty. [18][19][20] A recent military case series demonstrated that blast-associated tympanoplasty is associated with lower success rates than non-blast-reported outcomes and showed improvements in success rates with experience.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%