2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2022.154365
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surface treatment of the perovskite via self-assembled dipole layer enabling enhanced efficiency and stability for perovskite solar cells

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As presented in Figure c, compared to the control device, V TFL of RbF-treated device reduces from 0.72 to 0.53 V. Subsequently, the obtained V TFL could utilized to compare N trap of devices according to the following equation: N trap = 2εε 0 V TFL / qL 2 , where ε 0 represents the vacuum permittivity, ε is the relative permittivity, q denotes the electron charge, and L is the film thickness of CsPbI 2 Br perovskite. Accordingly, the decreased V TFL of the RbF-treated device should be inferred a lower N trap value than that of the pristine device, confirming the effective passivation on perovskite film, in agreement with the PL and TRPL decay curves . Then, the light intensity-dependent J–V curves of the assembled PSCs devices were recorded to determine the photoinduced charge recombination kinetics (Figure S5).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As presented in Figure c, compared to the control device, V TFL of RbF-treated device reduces from 0.72 to 0.53 V. Subsequently, the obtained V TFL could utilized to compare N trap of devices according to the following equation: N trap = 2εε 0 V TFL / qL 2 , where ε 0 represents the vacuum permittivity, ε is the relative permittivity, q denotes the electron charge, and L is the film thickness of CsPbI 2 Br perovskite. Accordingly, the decreased V TFL of the RbF-treated device should be inferred a lower N trap value than that of the pristine device, confirming the effective passivation on perovskite film, in agreement with the PL and TRPL decay curves . Then, the light intensity-dependent J–V curves of the assembled PSCs devices were recorded to determine the photoinduced charge recombination kinetics (Figure S5).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The V oc of the device increased from 1.08 to 1.16 V with a PCE of 21%. Kong and co-authors 116 used tetrabutylammonium chloride (TBAC, Fig. 19(b)) to self-assemble on the surface of the perovskite film.…”
Section: Sams As Interfacial Modification Layers For Perovskite Filmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[39] Copyright 2018, The Royal Society of Chemistry. [44] Copyright 2022, Elsevier. c) Schematic diagram of the perovskite/spiro-OMeTAD interface treated with CPS (V x : halide vacancies).…”
Section: Dipolar Interlayer At the Perovskite Layer/htl Interfacementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zhong et al reported that the PSC with a structure of ITO/SnO 2 /(FAPbI 3 ) 0.95 (MAPbBr 3 ) 0.05 /TBAC/spiro‐OMeTAD/Au delivered a greatly improved PCE of 23.5% compared with the PCE of 20.19% for the pristine device. [ 44 ] Furthermore, the TBAC dipolar interlayer protected the perovskite film from the H 2 O and O 2 damage and thereby enhanced the operational stability of PSCs. 4‐chlorobenzoic acid (4‐CBA) also can self‐assemble on the perovskite surface to form the monolayer with dipole moment.…”
Section: Dipolar Interlayers In Conventional (N–i–p) Structured Pscsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation