2013
DOI: 10.1007/s10008-013-2287-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surface thermodynamics reconsidered. Derivation of the Gokhshtein relations from the Gibbs potential and a new approach to surface stress

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
(13 reference statements)
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…and an electrical potential difference E between two electrodes e.g., between phase α if it is an electronic conductor and a reference electrode (ref. [8]. {reference [14] in the present work}) When the reference electrode is in equilibrium with a cation (anion) in phase β, E is given the subscript + (−).…”
Section: On the Alternative Formulations Of The Gibbs Adsorption Equamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…and an electrical potential difference E between two electrodes e.g., between phase α if it is an electronic conductor and a reference electrode (ref. [8]. {reference [14] in the present work}) When the reference electrode is in equilibrium with a cation (anion) in phase β, E is given the subscript + (−).…”
Section: On the Alternative Formulations Of The Gibbs Adsorption Equamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even after many years of disputes, a consensus regarding the different approaches is still being sought. Some of these issues have been discussed recently in excellent articles and reviews [6][7][8][9][10]. When considering which model is most appropriate to apply to the solid/liquid interfaces, one may argue that the results of the theoretical work can be proved experimentally.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, for electrodes containing electronically conducting solid phase(s), the correct thermodynamic treatment of the interface is not straightforward, and the thermodynamic theory of solid/liquid interfaces cannot be regarded as entirely correct [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10]. On the other hand, the measurement of surface parameters at the electrified solid/liquid interface is difficult, and the measuring methods are not without their limitations [11][12][13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, the measurement of surface parameters at the electrified solid/liquid interface is difficult, and the measuring methods are not without their limitations [11][12][13]. Some of these issues have been discussed recently in excellent articles and reviews [5][6][7][8]14]. The basic concepts of the Gibbs model of interfaces are summarized, e.g., in refs [2,11,15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation