2014
DOI: 10.1007/s10008-014-2433-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comment on “On the ‘simple check’ of electrocapillarity” by AY Gokhshtein

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…of Eq. (10) actually equals zero, as here the surface charge density q is a single-value function of the potential E (q = kE) and q is independent of A [5,6]. This is in agreement with the Lippmann's remark that q is a function of E independent of A [11], but this important fact is not even mentioned in [1].…”
Section: "Simple Thermodynamic Derivation" Of the Lippmann Equationsupporting
confidence: 74%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…of Eq. (10) actually equals zero, as here the surface charge density q is a single-value function of the potential E (q = kE) and q is independent of A [5,6]. This is in agreement with the Lippmann's remark that q is a function of E independent of A [11], but this important fact is not even mentioned in [1].…”
Section: "Simple Thermodynamic Derivation" Of the Lippmann Equationsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…However, this conclusion contradicts the fact that the so called the first and second Gokhshtein equations are only artificially distorted forms of the Lippmann equation and any discussions of their validity do not make sense [5].…”
Section: About the Validity Or Invalidity Of The Gokhstein And Lippmamentioning
confidence: 91%
See 3 more Smart Citations