2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2014.08.114
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surface/structure functionalization of copper-based catalysts by metal-support and/or metal–metal interactions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
30
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 93 publications
1
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The spectrum of the Cu/CeO 2 sample is characterized by a Cu 2p 3/2 band at 933.8 eV and shake-up satellites at ca. 944.0 eV, typical characteristics of Cu 2+ species in CuO-like phase [20,48,[66][67][68][69][70]. The above assignments are in line with the XRD findings, which revealed the formation of the corresponding metal oxides in M/CeO 2 samples (Table 2).…”
Section: Surface Characterization (Xps Analysis)supporting
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The spectrum of the Cu/CeO 2 sample is characterized by a Cu 2p 3/2 band at 933.8 eV and shake-up satellites at ca. 944.0 eV, typical characteristics of Cu 2+ species in CuO-like phase [20,48,[66][67][68][69][70]. The above assignments are in line with the XRD findings, which revealed the formation of the corresponding metal oxides in M/CeO 2 samples (Table 2).…”
Section: Surface Characterization (Xps Analysis)supporting
confidence: 76%
“…Under these perspectives, several catalytic systems, involving mainly base (e.g., Ni, Co, Cu) and precious (e.g., Pt, Rh, Ru, Pd, and Ir) metal supported catalysts have been reported for ESR [10,12]. Although the noble metal-based catalysts demonstrate sufficient reforming activity in a wide temperature range [10,12,[14][15][16][17][18][19], their large-scale implementation in practice is limited by their significant high cost [20]. Hence, the development of active and stable non-precious metal catalysts for ESR is highly desirable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This result is in agreement with the literature which reported that a Cu/ CeO 2 catalyst has higher reducibility than Cu/La 2 O 3 which can be seen on the reduction peak of CuO at 150-280°C and 200-350°C for Cu/CeO 2 and Cu/La 2 O 3 catalysts, respectively. 45 The similar position of the reduction peak of NiO with Ce substitution is due to the fact that the perovskite structure can still be formed as shown in the XRD results, indicating that while Ni interacts with Cu to form bimetallic Ni-Cu particles, Ni has also a strong interaction with La while Cu has a strong interaction with Ce.…”
Section: Reduction Profile (Tpr) Of Fresh Catalystsmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…CoCe-MA As shown in Figure 6, three reduction peaks were observed in the temperature range of 50-900 • C. According to the literature [39,41], the first reduction peak (P H2 -I) was attributed to the reduction of Co 3 O 4 to CoO, while the second peak (P H2 -II) was due to the further reduction of CoO to metallic cobalt [42]. In addition, the weak reduction peaks around 480 • C (P H2 -III) could be ascribed to the reduction of surface oxygen species of CeO 2 [43,44]. As listed in Table 5, the peak area ratios of P H2 -II/P H2 -I were in the range of 2.90−3.07, which was close to the theoretical values (the theoretical H 2 consumption ratio of P H2 -II/P H2 -I should be 3:1).…”
Section: Ph2-i Ph2-ii Ph2-iii Total Ratio Of Ph2-ii /Ph2-i T50 (°C) Tmentioning
confidence: 89%