2014
DOI: 10.1177/155892501400900201
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surface Roughness Evaluation of Textile Fabrics: A Literature Review

Abstract: Surface roughness is an important and effective factor in predicting tactile properties of fabrics. The definition of surface roughness and its different evaluating methods are divided into two main groups, subjective and objective, are reviewed. The latter consists of contact and non-contact methods. The evaluation in subjective and objective techniques is done by trained people as a measuring device and an apparatus, respectively.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
47
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
47
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The value of W z -according to the definition -refers only to a single curve, whereas the fabric is spatial. Considering this, for the seersucker woven fabric at work [14], the line was projected onto the surface of the fabric and several dozen lines were analyzed in the warp and weft directions. The width of the fabric part with the lines was determined in such a way as to cover the entire repeat of the seersucker effect and was determined separately for each of the analyzed directions.…”
Section: Methods Usedmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The value of W z -according to the definition -refers only to a single curve, whereas the fabric is spatial. Considering this, for the seersucker woven fabric at work [14], the line was projected onto the surface of the fabric and several dozen lines were analyzed in the warp and weft directions. The width of the fabric part with the lines was determined in such a way as to cover the entire repeat of the seersucker effect and was determined separately for each of the analyzed directions.…”
Section: Methods Usedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was also stated that the results from the Talysurf were affected by flexibility and less by reflectance of textiles [13]. Mooneghi et al [14] analyzed the different methods of evaluating the surface roughness of textile fabrics. On the basis of literature review, they listed the advantages and disadvantages of 17 different methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The low, medium and high frequency range variation are called form, waviness and roughness, respectively. Every surface has these three elements together and they are expected to be analyzed separately [4,[29][30][31].…”
Section: Fabric Profile Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…R is defined by the following equation in one sampling length (lr). R has been employed widely by researchers, textile testing textbooks, and the Kawabata system [4,[29][30][31]. 33) Rq Rq represents the root mean square deviation of the assessed profile in one sampling length [4,[29][30][31].…”
Section: ) Rmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation