2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2005.01.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surface roughness and fatigue performance of commercially pure titanium and Ti-6Al-4V alloy after different polishing protocols

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
58
0
5

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
3
58
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…After the mechanical tests, fractures were found only in the circumferential clasps of the samples casted in Cp Ti, suggesting technical difficulties in the casting process of Ti alloys. 9,12,14,15,20,23,24 However, the radiographic exam showed no porosity in the fractured buccal arms of Cp Ti 0.75 mm subgroups, which is in agreement with previous reports. 2,12,15,[18][19][20][21][22]24 Besides, even with the fractures in the retentive arms of the clasps of some samples, retention ranging from 0.81 N to 2.84 N after 5,400 cycles was observed as a result of the retention provided by the ERA attachment system.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…After the mechanical tests, fractures were found only in the circumferential clasps of the samples casted in Cp Ti, suggesting technical difficulties in the casting process of Ti alloys. 9,12,14,15,20,23,24 However, the radiographic exam showed no porosity in the fractured buccal arms of Cp Ti 0.75 mm subgroups, which is in agreement with previous reports. 2,12,15,[18][19][20][21][22]24 Besides, even with the fractures in the retentive arms of the clasps of some samples, retention ranging from 0.81 N to 2.84 N after 5,400 cycles was observed as a result of the retention provided by the ERA attachment system.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…10,12,15,17 Characteristics, such as its biocompatibility, corrosion-fatigue resistance, low cost compared with gold alloys and desirable physical and mechanical properties, have contributed to the increased use of commercially pure Ti(Cp Ti) and its alloys. 9,23,24 For mechanical properties stand point, the Ti-based alloys present low modulus of elasticity: 105-120 GPa (http:// en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Young's_modulus). This characteristic allows Ti-based frameworks to be designed using larger retentive undercut areas than recommended for Co-Cr alloys, being therefore more advantageous in clinical scenarios where esthetics and/or periodontal health are priorities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our result were in agreement with a previous report 17) , where surface treatments had no effect on fatigue life of titanium. Guilherme et al also reported that no correlation exists between surface roughness and fracture strength 33) ; however, surface treatments for ceramics often cause cracks on ceramics, which propagate internally causing mechanical strength to decrease. For yttria-stabilized tetragonal zirconia polycrystals, shot-blasted and acid-etched samples had lower fracture strengths relative to mirror polished samples 19,34) .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The titanium alloys have a high resistance to abrasion; thus they are more difficult to grind than the base metal and gold based alloys. 10 The high hardness of these alloys presents a real problem at finishing stage. 11,12 The mean marginal loss after finishing also showed statistically significant results when marginal loss in three margins were compared in groups 1A and 1B.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10 The high hardness of these alloys presents a real problem at finishing stage. 11,12 The mean marginal loss after finishing also showed statistically significant results when marginal loss in three margins were compared in groups 1A and 1B. shoulder with bevel margin showed statistically significant marginal loss when compared with chamfer and shoulder margins with p-value 0.0000 (p < 0.05).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%