2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2016.07.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surface roughening for hemi-wicking and its impact on convective boiling heat transfer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
28
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
2
28
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Considering that their tube was sandblasted and thus had a relatively high roughness (Ra of 3.14 µm), it is likely that the nanoparticles deposited on the surface reduced the roughness and number of active nucleation sites. The heat transfer of plain surfaces was improved in some studies when nanostructures were added to the pool boiling of refrigerants [18] and Fluorinerts [19][20][21], and the flow boiling of Fluorinerts [22], with authors attributing this to increased nucleation site density caused by the particular nanocoatings used. In some cases, the nanostructures only improved the heat transfer at higher heat fluxes, while at lower heat fluxes, the plain surfaces were comparable or better than the nanostructured surface [12,23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering that their tube was sandblasted and thus had a relatively high roughness (Ra of 3.14 µm), it is likely that the nanoparticles deposited on the surface reduced the roughness and number of active nucleation sites. The heat transfer of plain surfaces was improved in some studies when nanostructures were added to the pool boiling of refrigerants [18] and Fluorinerts [19][20][21], and the flow boiling of Fluorinerts [22], with authors attributing this to increased nucleation site density caused by the particular nanocoatings used. In some cases, the nanostructures only improved the heat transfer at higher heat fluxes, while at lower heat fluxes, the plain surfaces were comparable or better than the nanostructured surface [12,23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Its impact can be seen in Fig. 4 as a CHF increase, by more than 100%, on a wicking-inducing surface versus non-wicking conditions on a plain surface 12 34 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, forested silicon nanowires and analogous vertically standing nanostructures have been widely used to enhance heat transfer accompanying phase changes in working fluids and they can lead to extraordinary enhancements of critical heat flux and heat transfer coefficients16254647. Attractive characteristics in heat transfer applications include the fact that nanoscale structures can present an extremely rough interfacial morphology.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%