Surface-patch modeling of scatterers of arbitrary shapes

Wang, J.; Papanicolopulos, C.

doi:10.1109/aps.1979.1148221

Cited by 5 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 3 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Excellent agreement between the data and the computations was obtained, and a discrepancy with respect to polarization Some numerical examples, in addition to the data shown in references [40] - [42] , are shown in Figs. 22 and 23 for the circular and rectangular cylinders.…”

Section: Shaped Conducting Bodiesmentioning

confidence: 60%

“…in some of the measured data was identified[42]-This discrepancy in polarization also has been independently identi-Fig. 20.…”

mentioning

confidence: 86%

“…Recently, a trilateral surface-patch modeling algorithm using the magnetic field integral equation was developed at Georgia Tech [40] - [42]. Computations were performed for various geometries including the spheriod, the prolate spheriod, the circular finite cylinder, and the rectangular finite cylinder (boxes) for both the TE and TM incident field polarization.…”

Section: Shaped Conducting Bodiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Electromagnetic Models for Antenna Performance, EMC, and Biological Effects

Ryan

Cain

Wang

et al. 1980

IEEE Trans. Electromagn. Compat.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper describes several models which have been developed at Georgia Tech for the analysis of antennas, EMC, and biological effects. These models include algorithms based upon the plane-wave-spectrum scattering-matrix analysis, the geometrical theory of diffraction, and the method of moments. In addition, statistical models for antenna coupling, for out-of-band antenna performance, and for scattering by complex structures are discussed. In each case, the model results are compared with measured data to assess the accuracy of the modeling technique.

show abstract

Section: Shaped Conducting Bodiesmentioning

confidence: 60%

“…in some of the measured data was identified[42]-This discrepancy in polarization also has been independently identi-Fig. 20.…”

mentioning

confidence: 86%