2013
DOI: 10.4236/jemaa.2013.56039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surface Magnet Gears with a New Magnet Arrangement and Optimal Shape of Stationary Pole Pieces

Abstract:

In mechanical gear systems, dust, noise, vibration, and tooth wear are generated by frictions among gear teeth, and suppressing friction requires lubrication. Magnetic gears transmit torque by magnetic forces without contact and so avoid contact-related problems. The present paper discusses magnet arrangements and the shape of stationary gear teeth to improve transmission torque in surface magnet type magnetic gear transmission mechanisms. Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Both modulating pole pieces are supported with Aluminum end rings to prevent magnetic flux leakage in the axial direction and short circuit of the pole pieces. This is to reduce loss of transmission torque and improve efficiency which is consistent with the findings reported in a study [15].…”
Section: Mechanical Structuresupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Both modulating pole pieces are supported with Aluminum end rings to prevent magnetic flux leakage in the axial direction and short circuit of the pole pieces. This is to reduce loss of transmission torque and improve efficiency which is consistent with the findings reported in a study [15].…”
Section: Mechanical Structuresupporting
confidence: 90%
“…As an alternative, an IPE beam-like shape is also considered (type IV and V), obtained by removing some material at the middle sides of the section without detriment to the MRSP robustness and to the magnetic operating point. The convenience of this shape for the torque transmission capability was already verified for the CMGs [25].…”
Section: Optimization Of the Mrsp Cross-sectionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…In the designing, there is still a large difference between the measured and analyzed results [2] [3]. As one of the causes, we can point out that the actual movement of the magnetic gear has not been reproduced.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%