Quantum Chemistry and Dynamics of Excited States 2020
DOI: 10.1002/9781119417774.ch16
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surface Hopping Molecular Dynamics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
36
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 141 publications
0
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consequently, many semiclassical and fully quantum schemes were developed entailing various levels of computational complexity and controlled approximations with respect to an exact result (we refer the reader to references in recent reviews ). Here, the commonly used methods are multiconfigurational time-dependent Hartree (MC-TDH) and the related variational multiconfiguration Gaussian (vMCG) method, ab initio multiple spawning (AIMS), coupled-trajectory mixed quantum–classical method of exact factorization (CT-MQC), and multiconfigurational Ehrenfest with ab initio multiple cloning (MCE-AIMC), to name a few. As a result, the past couple of decades have witnessed a merging of electronic structure techniques (that provide estimates for electronic energies, wave functions, gradients of potential energy surfaces, and nonadiabatic couplings between levels) and various nonadiabatic algorithms (being essential dynamical propagators), producing versatile computational packages permitting direct atomistic dynamics to address a broad spectrum of problems.…”
Section: Ehrenfest Mean Fieldmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Consequently, many semiclassical and fully quantum schemes were developed entailing various levels of computational complexity and controlled approximations with respect to an exact result (we refer the reader to references in recent reviews ). Here, the commonly used methods are multiconfigurational time-dependent Hartree (MC-TDH) and the related variational multiconfiguration Gaussian (vMCG) method, ab initio multiple spawning (AIMS), coupled-trajectory mixed quantum–classical method of exact factorization (CT-MQC), and multiconfigurational Ehrenfest with ab initio multiple cloning (MCE-AIMC), to name a few. As a result, the past couple of decades have witnessed a merging of electronic structure techniques (that provide estimates for electronic energies, wave functions, gradients of potential energy surfaces, and nonadiabatic couplings between levels) and various nonadiabatic algorithms (being essential dynamical propagators), producing versatile computational packages permitting direct atomistic dynamics to address a broad spectrum of problems.…”
Section: Ehrenfest Mean Fieldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, the past couple of decades have witnessed a merging of electronic structure techniques (that provide estimates for electronic energies, wave functions, gradients of potential energy surfaces, and nonadiabatic couplings between levels) and various nonadiabatic algorithms (being essential dynamical propagators), producing versatile computational packages permitting direct atomistic dynamics to address a broad spectrum of problems. We further refer the reader to recent comprehensive reviews ,,, outlining various nonadiabatic methods and the current state of the field.…”
Section: Ehrenfest Mean Fieldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The good agreement between the experimental and the computed absorption spectrum of [1] + validates this computational approach (Figure ). The computed spectrum is obtained within the nuclear ensemble approach via a Wigner sampling of 200 geometries. The spectrum is then decomposed into the different contributions according to charge-transfer numbers using the TheoDORE software. , …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The computed spectrum is obtained within the nuclear ensemble approach via a Wigner sampling of 200 geometries. The spectrum is then decomposed into the different contributions according to charge-transfer numbers using the TheoDORE software. , …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The costs are negligible compared with the same-level QC calculation. 12,29 Thus, many studies have used ML potentials as a prominent accelerator for nonadiabatic molecular dynamics (NAMD) simulations, for instance, multiconfigurational time-dependent Hartree (MCTDH) 30 and trajectory surface hopping (TSH) 31 calculations. Several groups have developed ML mixed quantum−classical NAMD approaches (called ML photodynamics in this Account), such as MLAtom 32 with Newton-X 33 and SchNarc 34 with SHARC.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%