1979
DOI: 10.1144/sjg15040293
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surface features of heavy mineral grains from Palaeocene sands of the central North Sea

Abstract: Synopsis Scanning electron microscopy has revealed both mechanically and chemically produced surface textures on heavy mineral grains from Palaeocene sands of the central North Sea basin. Chemical activity initially modified irregular surfaces, producing mamillae. Further solution produced regular facets, the dimensions of which increase with intensity of etching. Variations in composition of the connate waters are thought responsible for slight variations in etching style. Mechanically-pro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
10
0
1

Year Published

1985
1985
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
2
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Until more is known about the burial history and diagenetic setting of basin margin deposits like the Munising Formation, the significance of garnet etching for burial history will remain conjectural. These findings also agree with earlier work (Mackie, 1923;Bramlette, 1929;Smithson, 1941 ;Sindowski, 1949;Rahmani, 1973;Hemingway & Tamar-Agha, 1975;Morton, 1979Morton, ,1984Morton, ,1987Gravenor, 1979Gravenor, , 1980Gravenor & Gostin, 1979;Gravenor & Leavitt, 1981 ;Borg, 1986;Hansley, 1987) favouring a dissolution origin for facets on garnets. The range of stratigraphic ages, depositional facies, and geological settings in which facet formation by dissolution occurs has probably been underestimated by previous workers.…”
Section: Significancesupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Until more is known about the burial history and diagenetic setting of basin margin deposits like the Munising Formation, the significance of garnet etching for burial history will remain conjectural. These findings also agree with earlier work (Mackie, 1923;Bramlette, 1929;Smithson, 1941 ;Sindowski, 1949;Rahmani, 1973;Hemingway & Tamar-Agha, 1975;Morton, 1979Morton, ,1984Morton, ,1987Gravenor, 1979Gravenor, , 1980Gravenor & Gostin, 1979;Gravenor & Leavitt, 1981 ;Borg, 1986;Hansley, 1987) favouring a dissolution origin for facets on garnets. The range of stratigraphic ages, depositional facies, and geological settings in which facet formation by dissolution occurs has probably been underestimated by previous workers.…”
Section: Significancesupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Recent papers indicate that hypotheses for the origin of faceted surface features on garnet grains remain controversial. Although most workers favour origin of faceted (positive-relief) features by intrastratal dissolution (Mackie, 1923;Bramlette, 1929;Smithson, 1941 ;Sindowski, 1949;Rahmani, 1973;Hemingway & Tamar-Agha, 1975;Morton, 1979Morton, ,1984Morton, ,1987Gravenor, 1979Gravenor, , 1980Gravenor & Gostin, 1979;Gravenor & Leavitt, 1981;Borg, 1986;Hansley, 1987), some recent workers propose that the facets are overgrowth features (e.g., Simpson, 1976;Howie et al, 1980;Mader, 1981).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although garnets are fairly resistant to diagenesis, strong dissolution does occur where great burial depths are involved, or where they have been subjected to percolation of acidic groundwaters in weathering (Morton, 1984a). There is every possibility that different garnet species have different stabilities : indeed, this may explain why garnet dissolution in the North Sea Palaeocene appears to begin at relatively shallow depths, although it persists throughout the sands to depths in excess of 3000m (Morton, 1979(Morton, , 1984a. The behaviour of garnet suites under intrastratal solution conditions needs to be fully elucidated before the technique is employed in areas where this is a potential problem.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The corrosion signature of heavy minerals indicates different transportation, sedimentation, and burial conditions [32][33][34]. The SEM images of Core LQ24 revealed that the amphibole and epidote in the Pliocene strata were more corroded than the tourmaline mineral present in both the Pliocene and Pleistocene sediments (Figures 9-11).…”
Section: The Factors Which May Cause Variations In Surface Texture Ofmentioning
confidence: 99%