2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.optlaseng.2015.04.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surface enhanced Raman spectroscopy measurements of MCF7 cells adhesion in confined micro-environments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…N bulk and N SERS are the numbers of molecules in the volume of contributing normal Raman scattering and SERS, respectively, as detailed in Supplementary Materials . The calculated EF was 4.88 × 10 5 and distinctive molecular identification of the cell components could be expected [ 32 ]. To evaluate the reproducibility of the substrates, the relative standard deviation (RSD) values at 612, 773, 1362 and 1650 cm −1 were estimated from the 50 collected Raman spectra of R6G.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…N bulk and N SERS are the numbers of molecules in the volume of contributing normal Raman scattering and SERS, respectively, as detailed in Supplementary Materials . The calculated EF was 4.88 × 10 5 and distinctive molecular identification of the cell components could be expected [ 32 ]. To evaluate the reproducibility of the substrates, the relative standard deviation (RSD) values at 612, 773, 1362 and 1650 cm −1 were estimated from the 50 collected Raman spectra of R6G.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In spite of their excellent capture efficiency and limit of detection (LOD), complex post processes, including cell release, for investigating genetic information of tumor cells hinder its clinical application due to the low cell viability. In order to enable molecular characterization and cell analysis without post processes, SERS spectroscopy employing nanogap-rich metal nanoparticles-based structures can be an effective analytic tool [ 32 , 33 ]. Although SERS spectroscopy can investigate CTCs directly, few researches have reported the capture efficiency at the same time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to the established bioimaging methods, SERS offers multiple advantages such as exceptionally high sensitivity, intrinsic molecular ngerprint information, resistance to photobleaching and -degradation as well as a non-invasive longterm multiplex monitoring within various applications [11,[15][16][17][18]. Despite proving its e cacy in several breast cancer-related in vitro, in-vivo and ex-vivo studies [19][20][21][22], the clinical establishment of SERS still remains challenging due to several drawbacks: i) the slow uptake rate of bare SERS-tags, ii) uncertain biocompatibility, iii) interfering species (e.g. a protein corona) adsorbing onto the metallic surface after in vitro/in vivo administration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, each molecule shows up a unique Raman spectrum so that a specific fingerprint can be associated with each biological substance, a fact that is of fundamental importance to establish the specificity of the analysis method [16,17]. Differently from many other analytical techniques, Raman spectroscopy allows label-free analysis of samples and it is compatible with measurements in aqueous solutions, indispensable conditions for reducing the biological sample pretreatment [18,19,20,21,22,23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%