2011
DOI: 10.1002/adma.201100065
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surface Doping of Conjugated Polymers by Graphene Oxide and Its Application for Organic Electronic Devices

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
174
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 205 publications
(175 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
1
174
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[ 11,13,[33][34][35][36][37] Since we are not intend to focus on the systematic investigation of chemical doping, the chemical doping of PBTTT with NOPF 6 and surface proton doping of P3HT by graphene oxide were performed according to previous reports to make a preliminary comparison of the fi eld-modulated and chemically doped thermoelectric properties of organic semiconductors. [ 25,33 ] Figure 3 a,b summarize the S -σ of PBTTT and P3HT obtained by both electric fi eld modulation and chemical doping, where for the OFET measurements, the electrical conductivity σ was calculated by assuming that the conductive channel has a thickness of two molecular layers (3.4−4.0 nm) ( Figure S1, Supporting Information). Full fi lm thickness and 3.4 nm were used to calculate the conductivity of chemically doped fi lms of PBTTT and P3HT, respectively, owing to the interfacial doping nature of P3HT by graphene oxide.…”
Section: Thermoelectric Characterization Of Ofetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 11,13,[33][34][35][36][37] Since we are not intend to focus on the systematic investigation of chemical doping, the chemical doping of PBTTT with NOPF 6 and surface proton doping of P3HT by graphene oxide were performed according to previous reports to make a preliminary comparison of the fi eld-modulated and chemically doped thermoelectric properties of organic semiconductors. [ 25,33 ] Figure 3 a,b summarize the S -σ of PBTTT and P3HT obtained by both electric fi eld modulation and chemical doping, where for the OFET measurements, the electrical conductivity σ was calculated by assuming that the conductive channel has a thickness of two molecular layers (3.4−4.0 nm) ( Figure S1, Supporting Information). Full fi lm thickness and 3.4 nm were used to calculate the conductivity of chemically doped fi lms of PBTTT and P3HT, respectively, owing to the interfacial doping nature of P3HT by graphene oxide.…”
Section: Thermoelectric Characterization Of Ofetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The heavily doped interface, with higher conductivity, facilitates the formation of an Ohmic contact between the active layer and the top metal electrode. [ 33 ] Additionally, the high-lying E LUMO of graphene oxide (GO) allows the material to act as an effective electron blocking interlayer. [ 34 ] When MoO 3 is replaced with GO, an improved PCE of 5.5% is obtained due to an enhanced V OC and J SC ( Figure 5 a).…”
Section: Charge Carrier Mobilitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…
edioxythiophene):poly(styrene-sulfonate) (PEDOT:PSS), [ 9 ] sol-gel-processed metal oxides, [ 10 ] self-assembled monolayers, [ 11 ] quantum dots, [ 12 ] 2D nanomaterials, [ 13,14 ] ionic compounds, [ 15,16 ] and oxygen-plasma treatment. [ 17 ] However, those methods suffer from various drawbacks, such as an acidic nature, a high processing temperature, poor stability in air, or processing that is incompatible with various printing fabrication techniques (i.e., the roll-to-roll printing method), which need to be overcome for their successful application to organic electronics.

Conjugated polyelectrolytes (CPEs), π-conjugated polymers with ionic groups on the side chains, have been used to effectively reduce the energy barrier between the metal electrode and the organic active layer through the development of an electric dipole layer and a shift in the vacuum levels of the adjacent active layers.

…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%