2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2009.04.029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surface Cu depletion of Cu(In,Ga)Se2 films: An investigation by hard X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
71
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
10
71
0
Order By: Relevance
“…25 and 26, our previous studies by AXES and hard xray photoelectron spectroscopy consistently provided strong experimental evidence that this surface copper depletion of polycrystalline Cu(In,Ga)Se 2 thin films is limited to an extremely thin and completely copper depleted surface layer. 20,27 This result supports first-principle calculations that predict a defect-induced surface reconstruction, explaining the unusual high stability of polar facets at chalcopyrite surfaces, where massive removal of surface copper from the top atomic layer compensates the charge imbalance of the dipoles. 28 Due to the limited sensitivity, such a thin surface layer is not accessible by AXES.…”
Section: A Axes Experimentssupporting
confidence: 75%
“…25 and 26, our previous studies by AXES and hard xray photoelectron spectroscopy consistently provided strong experimental evidence that this surface copper depletion of polycrystalline Cu(In,Ga)Se 2 thin films is limited to an extremely thin and completely copper depleted surface layer. 20,27 This result supports first-principle calculations that predict a defect-induced surface reconstruction, explaining the unusual high stability of polar facets at chalcopyrite surfaces, where massive removal of surface copper from the top atomic layer compensates the charge imbalance of the dipoles. 28 Due to the limited sensitivity, such a thin surface layer is not accessible by AXES.…”
Section: A Axes Experimentssupporting
confidence: 75%
“…The results of the S 2p and Fe 2p band fitting are also presented as a function of excitation photon energy in Fig. 2, with approximate information depths [37][38][39][40][41][42]. Whereas the calculated O/S and C/S ratios rapidly fall with increasing photon energy, the Fe/S ratios are higher at an excitation energy of 2 keV but decrease to an approximately stoichiometric value of 0.5 (at 3 keV), at which it remains at higher excitation energies.…”
Section: Haxpesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The spectra were acquired at photon energies from 2 keV to 6 keV and, in some cases, to 9 keV; the slit width was of 0.5 mm for all the excitation photon energies. Atomic ratios of elements (I i,h ) relative to S were calculated from the intensity area of the detail spectra for each energy (A i,h ) employing photoionization cross-sections ( i,h ) tabulated in [57,58] and the ones extrapolated for the higher energies, and taking into account IMFP ( (KE) i ) calculated for FeS 2 and Fe 9 S 10 employing TPP−2M formula [38] and analyzer's transmission function (T(KE) i ) [40][41][42] using following equation…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…D) was explained in the past by the formation of an ordered defect compound (ODC) layer 46,47 or by surface reconstruction. 51,52 While according to first-principles calculations the ODC can be considered as periodic repetition of the charge compensated (2 V Cu À þ In Cu 2þ ) defect complex (as described in Ref. 53), it was also suggested by theory that the surface reconstruction is based on the formation of the energetically most favorable metal-terminated (112) and selenium-terminated ( 112) CIGSe surfaces stabilized through V Cu À and subsurface In Cu 2þ defects, respectively.…”
Section: E Binding Energy Shiftmentioning
confidence: 99%