1989
DOI: 10.1016/0021-9797(89)90359-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surface composition of coalesced acrylic latex films studied by XPS and SIMS

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
38
1
1

Year Published

1991
1991
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
38
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A parallel approach, but with a different polymer, was undertaken by Matos et al [44], here TEM elemental mapping of nitrogen was used to show that CTAB adhered preferentially at the edges of the rGO sheets and coalesced rubber. The ability of surfactants to alter interfacial energy is one of the driving forces for the migration towards the interface during film formation [114]. This characteristic was proposed to be an important factor for the interaction between filler and polymer matrix.…”
Section: Accepted M Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A parallel approach, but with a different polymer, was undertaken by Matos et al [44], here TEM elemental mapping of nitrogen was used to show that CTAB adhered preferentially at the edges of the rGO sheets and coalesced rubber. The ability of surfactants to alter interfacial energy is one of the driving forces for the migration towards the interface during film formation [114]. This characteristic was proposed to be an important factor for the interaction between filler and polymer matrix.…”
Section: Accepted M Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zhao and co-workers (18,19) have shown by XPS, SIMS, and FTIR-ATR that films from MMA-BMA latexes prepared using the same surfactant as in the present work (sodium dodecyl diphenylether disulfonate, SDED) or sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) have different behaviors: in the case of SDS, they observed an enrichment of surfactant at the film-air and filmsubstrate interfaces during the film maturation. This is expected because the surface active agents lower the interfacial tension at the polymer/air and polymer/substrate interfaces.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…This incompatibility likely results in their migration to the polymer surface [20,21]. In the case of emulsion PSAs, the enrichment of the surface by the surfactants creates a weak boundary layer when the PSA layer is applied to an adherend and, thus, results in a decrease of adhesion properties [22][23][24][25]. Therefore, it is necessary to analyze the surfactants distribution in the composite PSA.…”
Section: Surface Analysis Of Composite Psas Using Xpsmentioning
confidence: 98%