2013
DOI: 10.4012/dmj.2012-160
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surface characterization of current composites after toothbrush abrasion

Abstract: The present study was designed to evaluate the surface roughness and the gloss of current composites before and after toothbrush abrasion. We assessed forty dimensionally standardized composite specimens (n=8/group) from five composites: two nanohybrids (i.e., IPS Empress Direct Enamel and IPS Empress Direct Dentin), two microhybrids (i.e., Clearfil AP-X and Filtek Z250) and one organically modified ceramics (Admira). All of the specimens were polished with 4000-grid silicon carbide papers. Surface roughness w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
65
0
6

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
10
65
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Although a significant difference in the mean gloss units between the ceramic block and five composite materials was detected before toothbrush abrasion, the gloss unit values of the composite materials were greater than 82.6 GU. Takahashi et al reported that the human eye cannot distinguish between high and very high luster of over 70 GU 15) . After toothbrush abrasion, the gloss unit values of all materials were greater than 70 GU, with the exception of the Shofu Block HC material.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although a significant difference in the mean gloss units between the ceramic block and five composite materials was detected before toothbrush abrasion, the gloss unit values of the composite materials were greater than 82.6 GU. Takahashi et al reported that the human eye cannot distinguish between high and very high luster of over 70 GU 15) . After toothbrush abrasion, the gloss unit values of all materials were greater than 70 GU, with the exception of the Shofu Block HC material.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The surface gloss of the specimens before and after the toothbrush abrasion test was expressed in gloss units (GU) and was measured using a gloss meter (GM-26D, Murakami Color Research Laboratory, Tokyo, Japan) with an incident angle of 60º 15) . The gloss meter was calibrated with a reference black board of a known gloss value.…”
Section: Gloss Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By mixing a 2:1 ratio by volume of deionized water and a daily used dentifrice (Colgate Total, Colgate-Palmolive, England), the slurry, which was used as a third medium in the brushing simulation, was prepared. For one year, 10,000 strokes were performed at a frequency of 1 Hz; a double pass of the toothbrush head on the specimen was considered a stroke 14,15) . The toothbrushes were changed after every 10,000 strokes.…”
Section: Artificial Agingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gloss characterizes the specular reflection of the restoration surface 21) . Regression analysis has been used to predict the relationship between Ra and gloss of the examined surface 22) . However, a consensus of their relationship has not been established.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%