2007
DOI: 10.1080/00908310500430901
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surface Area of Activated Carbon Determined by the Iodine Adsorption Number

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
27
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Both measurements should be regarded as indicative. Iodine adsorption can be related to (Mianowski et al 2007), although there may still be up to 20% difference in the surface calculated from their respective adsorption. Methylene blue is a cation; both pore size and charge effects may influence its adsorption.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Both measurements should be regarded as indicative. Iodine adsorption can be related to (Mianowski et al 2007), although there may still be up to 20% difference in the surface calculated from their respective adsorption. Methylene blue is a cation; both pore size and charge effects may influence its adsorption.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The relationship between the iodine number and internal surface area in terms of m 2 /g of activated carbon has been well established in the literature for various precursors. The most recent studies by Mianowski et al [21], Bestani et al [22] and Noszko et al [23] have established equivalence of iodine number with BET surface area with in acceptable errors valid up to a BET surface area of 1000 m 2 /g. At surface areas higher than 1000 m 2 /g the surface areas are found to be higher than the iodine number [21].…”
Section: Product Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Results showed the dissociation constant (K d ) values decreased from 2000 mL/g under aerobic conditions to 70 mL/g under anaerobic conditions. Due to the well-documented high affinity of iodine towards activated carbon (Juhola, 1975;Mianowski et al, 2007;Yang et al, 1993), the authors concluded that iodide removal is facilitated by the oxidation of iodide to iodine by dissolved oxygen, which is subsequently adsorbed by the activated carbon. Hence, the effectiveness of activated carbon in iodide removal is dependent on dissolved oxygen concentrations (Maes et al, 2004).…”
Section: Carbonmentioning
confidence: 97%