2012
DOI: 10.1380/ejssnt.2012.431
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surface Area Effect of Zinc Oxide for Steam Reforming of Ethanol over Supported-Platinum Catalysts

Abstract: The effect of surface area over the ZnO-supported platinum catalysts on the catalytic performance of steam reforming of ethanol (SRE) has been studied. Various surface area of ZnO is prepared through two routes: reflux (assigned as ZnO-R), thermal decomposition under air (assigned as ZnO-A) and under N2 (assigned as ZnO-N). Also, the commercial ZnO (assigned as ZnO-C) is chosen as reference. Four Pt/ZnO catalysts (3 wt% loading of Pt) are prepared by incipient wetness impregnation (assigned as Pt-R, Pt-A, Pt-N… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
(32 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Al 2 O 3 was purchased from Merck (γ-form, 142 m 2 ⋅g −1 ), while the others were self-synthesized. The ZrO 2 (130 m 2 ⋅g −1 ) was prepared using the sol-gel method ( Bi et al, 2007a ), the CeO 2 (106 m 2 ⋅g −1 ) was prepared using a simple reduction-oxidation method ( Siang et al, 2010 ), the Co 3 O 4 (102 m 2 ⋅g −1 ) and NiO (104 m 2 ⋅g −1 ) were prepared by the precipitation-oxidation method ( Wang et al, 2005a ; Lai et al, 2006 ), and the ZnO (89 m 2 ⋅g −1 ) was obtained through the thermal decomposition of Zn(OH) 2 ·2ZnCO 3 ·xH 2 O (Stream) in the air ( Chiou et al, 2012 ), respectively. The supported PtRu catalysts were prepared by the impregnation method using an aqueous solution of H 2 PtCl 6 (Merck) and RuCl 3 (Strem) as precursors (the loading of each component was 1.5 wt%).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Al 2 O 3 was purchased from Merck (γ-form, 142 m 2 ⋅g −1 ), while the others were self-synthesized. The ZrO 2 (130 m 2 ⋅g −1 ) was prepared using the sol-gel method ( Bi et al, 2007a ), the CeO 2 (106 m 2 ⋅g −1 ) was prepared using a simple reduction-oxidation method ( Siang et al, 2010 ), the Co 3 O 4 (102 m 2 ⋅g −1 ) and NiO (104 m 2 ⋅g −1 ) were prepared by the precipitation-oxidation method ( Wang et al, 2005a ; Lai et al, 2006 ), and the ZnO (89 m 2 ⋅g −1 ) was obtained through the thermal decomposition of Zn(OH) 2 ·2ZnCO 3 ·xH 2 O (Stream) in the air ( Chiou et al, 2012 ), respectively. The supported PtRu catalysts were prepared by the impregnation method using an aqueous solution of H 2 PtCl 6 (Merck) and RuCl 3 (Strem) as precursors (the loading of each component was 1.5 wt%).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is likely due to the higher surface energy and adhesion of TCP molecules on iron and iron carbide compared to iron oxide. 13 Previous DFT calculations suggested that the surface energy of a-Fe(110) (2.3 J m À2 ) 51 and Fe 3 C(010) (2.2 J m À2 ) 52 is much larger than Fe 3 O 4 (001) (1.0 J m À2 ). 98 For the iron and iron carbide systems, the friction coefficient decreases with increasing temperature (Table S2, ESI †); in contrast, the Derjaguin offset increases with increasing temperature (Table S3, ESI †).…”
Section: Surface Chemistry Effects On Shear Stressmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…50 Magnetite was selected since previous experiments have shown that it is the major oxide formed on the surface of bearing steel following tribometer experiments. 37 We used an a-Fe(110) for the iron surface, 51 Fe 3 C(010) as the cementite surface, 52 and Fe 3 O 4 (001) with a subsurface cation vacancy (SCV) reconstruction as the magnetite surface 53 due to their relatively low surface energies.…”
Section: System Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation