2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0267-7261(02)00117-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surface and downhole shear wave seismic methods for thick soil site investigations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
25
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
25
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The down hole or cross hole profiling methods allow in situ measurements of the shear-wave velocity with depth. However, the performance of these methods for site characterization can be rather difficult and expensive in urban areas because these methods require boreholes [19,20]. To overcome these problems, non-invasive seismic exploration has emerged as a promising alternative to estimate the shear wave profiles and the resonance frequencies.…”
Section: Geophysical Investigationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The down hole or cross hole profiling methods allow in situ measurements of the shear-wave velocity with depth. However, the performance of these methods for site characterization can be rather difficult and expensive in urban areas because these methods require boreholes [19,20]. To overcome these problems, non-invasive seismic exploration has emerged as a promising alternative to estimate the shear wave profiles and the resonance frequencies.…”
Section: Geophysical Investigationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ground penetrating radar (GPR) defines the thicknesses of different layers of substructure [12][13]. Down-hole seismic test is suitable for estimating the shear wave velocities of different trackbed materials [14]. On the other hand, most of the geophysical methods present some difficulties in trackbed investigations.…”
Section: Site Selection and Prospectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ansal et al 2004;Slob et al 2002;Olieveira 2004;Street et al 2001). The areas located on young unconsolidated sedimentary deposits experienced greater amplification of ground motion (Hunter et al 2002). In 2001, the epicentre of Bhuj earthquake was about 400 km away from Ahmadabad (India), but the city was highly affected by earthquake because it was located over the younger alluvial deposits (Ranjan 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%